Pre-PE FLACCID Girth

Measurement should be taken at mid-shaft.

To go along with the FLACCID Length poll.

Oops. I voted 5.51-5.75. I thought it was erect.

I’ve taken this off.

Thanks.

Who had >8 inch pre-pe flacid girth? For that matter, who has >8 inch flacid girth?

Good point jm, I removed some of those unrealistically high values.

Not a knock against you Stevie, I thought I saw someone vote for that.

No worries jm, it was probably just a troll or “hater” trying to mess with our data. Not much we can do about it, but taking off those higher level ranges might help dissuade some off the wall voting. Here’s to hoping anyways. :)

Thanks…

Take one 5.51 - 5.75 off also. I thought it meant erect; obviously I did not read carefully.

I don’t know how you can figure anything anyway. Flaccid girth is totally dependent on weather and inviro. If you standing in a sauna it would be on thing. If you were standing out in the snow it would be another. Same goes for flaccid length. Unpredicable and no standard of measurement.

I would like to see those 3 >6.50” FLACCID girth. Now THAT’s insane.

Monty, while I agree an average flaccid value - either length or girth - will never be as accurate as an erect value, I do think we can still draw a somewhat close estimate of the average. I personally know what my average flaccid size is. Sure there are days it’s bigger when the weather is nice, but I’d say it remains close to the same 90% of the time. Even the fluctuation during the 90% consistent days is no more than say 1/4” in either length or girth. Plus, looking at the voting results so far, I do see a definite average forming. It would be interesting to see how the results look after another 1,000 or so votes like we have on the erect polls.

Like someone said it varies, so in my opinion the results cannot be reliable.

is this diameter or circumference? if it’s diameter then I did it ok. But if it was circumference, then I missed the spot.