The issue of boob size came up and I find it interesting as comparison and as a way to finally, once and for all, sort out this eternal question of penis size. Have you noticed that women’s breasts become much meatier when she is pregnant and also later in the breast feeding period? Together with the earlier explanation that men more often than not are attracted to big, round, cosy breasts, this attractor has a clear evolutionary purpose to make his woman pregnant and increase multiplicity of family members. In earlier times it was necessary to have as many offspring as possible since many of the died from famine and from consumption by wild animals. It is the growing, maturing breast that fascinates more than the state, the cycles of increasing pleasure.
Today, in many wealthy parts of the world this attractor works to increase variety rather than multiplicity in the species. This is due to the fact that we use contraceptives, which means that many women that otherwise would grow larger breasts periodically now are constantly flat-chested. The fascination of the growing breasts is gone. Some of them tries to conform to the ideal of big breasts by artificial measures, but they miss the dynamic point. Other women don’t want to change themselves artificially, or cannot afford it. Hence, it tends to promote variety since a larger portion of the male population than before are driven to seek out new partners with larger breasts; they are attracted to the change, not the state. Men that grow tired of the large, constant floppies are driven to seek out women with small, virgin breasts to once again experience the magnificent transformation, the change in state.
The evolutionary meaning of PE now is crystal clear. It works against evolution in that it decreases variety. This is because women, which as we saw in earlier posts for some reason likes larger penii - maybe because of that mystic firebolt-provoking anterior fornix area - now can experience increasingly more pleasurable experiences with the same partner. Again, it is the change more than the state that is the attractor. This makes women fool around less, from a statistical, large population view. It has no positive evolutionary effect as far as I can see.
This is the simple explanation why PE is good for us as individuals and our relationships, but bad for the human species.