Secondary sexual charasteristics and penis size

Does secondary sexual charasteristics have any influence on penis size?

I know a friend who’s maybe 5’4 but has alot of body hair and is quite aggressive etc and on the other hand of the spectrum is a friend who’s about 6’4 but has about as much body hair as a fifteen year old and has a quite voice. We know taestostorone has an effect on puberty and height etc. However, these two individuals seem to be contradicting common sense.

Any thoughts?

Yeah,it has crossed my mind too.I had a theory that you can tell what size is a guy’s penis by the amount of body hair,aggression and stuff like that which would indicate his level of testosterone.

I myself don’t think I have a high level,because I have almost no body hair-only in the armpits and pubic.But I have a manly voice though:) .

But I don’t think it has anything to do with penis size,because my friend,who seems to be full of testosterone has a smaller dick than me.

Thing is chemicals in the environment have an impact on the natural growth of the penis and height, as well as lack of certain chemicals and nutrients etc that play a part in the development of both. And testosterone supposedly only has an effect on the penis in the womb - the level of your current testosterone may or may not have any correlation with the amount you had in your mummy. It’s all very hazy.

Maybe it would interest you to know that some scientist said he discovered a correlation between finger size, testosterone level in the womb, aggression, the ability to win competitions, penis size and other things. Saw a documentary on it, he predicted who would win the race 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc and he got them all right except 3rd and 4th place.

A lot of short guys compensate for their height with a more aggressive attitude.

Short Man Syndrome.

I do not believe that body hair or penis size is soley based on testosterone alone;although it may be a main factor. There is also a hereditery link, I read where penis size runs in families.

Beasty,

I saw that same program, it was an original British production that got repackaged and throw in for an episode on American cable for the Discovery or Science channel or some shit.

“Short Man’s Syndrome” = an extreme generalization that acts as a self-fulfilling prophecy, and lends to the stereotype of heightism in our society.

Yep that’s the one..;)

lol, I’m glad you share my sentiments, Drilla.

I was watching “Family Business” the other day. For those who haven’t seen the show, it basically follows the daily life of porn directer/producer Seymour Butts.

In the episode, he did a radio interview for Playboy radio. The female hosts asked him about penis size and how to tell if guys are hung. He basically said (aside from feet and hands) that ears and the bridge of a man’s nose are good indicators. He said that the bigger the bridge, the bigger the cock.

A story like that has GOT to be true.

I do love watching PORN: A Family Business. Man what a great docusoap. I’m not so sure about feet or hands, they are wishy washy. I know some palmistry and I can tell whats hands belong to those of artists, boxers, intellectuals, gamblers, psychics, leaders etc. Well there is some correlation that artists may have short, possibly curvatured fingers, but boney joints and knuckles. And that boxers tend to have very wide palms and rectangular shaped fingers. I’m not too certain this is a good indicator of penis size, it is probably a good indicator of someone with good physical genetics (mesomorphs). But probably very little to do with penis size. I know that when I was a baby and a young child I had a very long penis for someone who was shorter then average in height most of my life. It is maybe an indicator of someone who is ‘sexually healthy’ then ‘well endowed’. You get basketball players like Dennis Rodman who are physically overwhelming and intimidating but according to stories of women he has slept with his penis is average or less. I do think though taller, wider and more muscularly developed men stand a more likely chance of owning a big penis but according to penissizesurvey.com or something like that the difference is fractional and barely noticeable. Kind of like getting a good hand in poker, even though it is a good hand that is likely to win, if the 5 cards faced up on the board dont correlate with the hand its useless.

I don’t think you can draw any correlation here. Most of these characteristics are just the result of the genetic crapshoot. For example, I’m a big man, pretty tall at six foot three, and over 350 pounds weight at present. About the only places where I don’t grow thick dark hair are my forehead, nose, cheeks, palms, and soles. My penis is very “average” in size. I share all these characteristics with my father and brother too (except my father’s hair is, or was, red).

As for aggression and testosterone, my natural test levels are pretty high and I’m a calm, cheerful kind of guy, in a shoe-gazing introvert sort of way. I’ve been known to augment my natural testosterone levels and more testosterone doesn’t make me more aggressive, it makes me focussed, calmer and more content.

So it can be a mistake to correlate high testosterone with high aggression. Any correlation between testosterone and body size, hirsutism, or penis size is secondary to the subject’s genetic makeup.

I don’t think so. I am around 6’3, with a lot of body hair, thick facial hair growth, an athletic build, and a deep voice. My dick was slighlty under 5” when I started PE, so evidently not.

Also known as Napoleon syndrome.