Small, Medium, Large Defined

What do you guys make of this? Accurate? Why? Why not?

Do the pictures used look accurate?

condom size and facts: How big is big - How small is small - What is normal - How do I compare?

I do not know my size anymore so I do not care girls / ladies like it and this is what drives me

Hm, according to this I have a big girth (but only barely), and my length is closer to very big. Doesn’t seem quite right, but I’m enjoying the idea. :)

Seriously, though, I have problems thinking of 18.7cm BP as a “very long penis”.. But I guess the author is thinking of it in a purely statistical way.

In the same boat as you here man. I really don’t see 18.7 cm as being crazy long or anything like that. But with only 2.5% sporting that size, but that’s outside of two standard deviations, meaning that it’s quite unusual. It’s just so easy to think of those porn angled penises and think that those guys are a dime a dozen at 20 cm NBP. Gotta keep in touch with reality though.

I’ll take this chart with a large grain of salt. Interesting though.

I didn’t realize that was bone-pressed. I actually think the supposed 5” average is nbp. 7.4” nbpel would seem big to me. Hmm. Any thoughts on the pictures?

As for the pics, my body dysmorphia kicks in and tells me I’m not nearly that big and don’t look it either. So unfortunately I can’t contribute much on this topic.

Glad I’m not the only one. I’ve seen big, mine is not big. I believe a 6.5-7.5 inch BP is more common than statistics show. Definitely not big. I also think 5.5-6inch girth is more common than statistics show. At 5.8 meg, I definitely don’t consider myself big.

+1 — I think I can safely say I don’t think I’m small (maybe a little thin) at 7.5-7.75” BPEL (6.5-6.75” NBPEL) and 5.1-5.2” MEG, but I still can’t see it as ‘big’. At least I know what I see with my own eyes is likely wrong, but it’s hard to believe that I’m even in the upper 10%, or even upper 25% for girth.

Girth is what makes it look big to others. Also waist size ect. I am in the large categories in this and I am broad so I don’t look large but I you have a 7.5x5.5 with a 28” waist it will way bigger. It’s all about perception. Not how big it really is. That’s why short small guys will have bigger looking ones in proportion if they are above average.

To be clear, I tend to think of fat pads as being around one inch, based on my own and the average fat pad from a study that measured both bp and nbp. If we were talking 18,7cm NBP, I’d agree that we could be talking of a long dick (longer than your standard porn actor, for instance).

Your nbpel seems on the large side to me. In general, I think the old 5-7 inch nbpel average holds true. I’m 5.75 inches nbpel on a good day and feel average.

Well, according to that, I am big before pumping and very big after pumping. Of course my goal is to be very big before pumping, whether or not those tables are of any value.

Maybe. Really I don’t have anything to base it on but my own eyes, and I think the fact that I’m around 5.25” flaccid (on a good day, and not pressed in), the 1.25-1.5” growth just doesn’t look like much. That said, it isn’t that uncommon for me to see a porn where it is labelled big or the girl comments/has some issues, and the guy just looks ‘average’ to me (in other words, around my size).

That said…2016 goal is to get above 8” BPEL, and also shrink the pad pad hopefully by half…so if I can do that, maybe I’ll be bordering on the ‘monster’ category for 2017…

All I know is that convenience stores around where I live always have greater variety regular sized condoms than magnums (this means there’s less donkey phalli than regular ;) ) I used to have a good fit in a regular, but after gains they are getting very snug. The mags always fit perfectly but if I pump beforehand ill probably need magnum xxl lol.