Suspensory Ligaments, Attachment Points and LOT

Hey guys.

Something that I have never understood about LOT theory is how new growth factors in.

My understanding of LOT is that the attachment point to the shaft doesn’t change and that is why you “divide and conquer” by stretching suspensory ligs downward first to allow movement then stretching them outward revealing the available penis that was inside the body.

So if I started at just over 6” BP and my suspensory ligs were attached right at the base of by penis and I grew to 8” BP, wouldn’t the attachment point of my suspensory ligs now be attached about 2” from the base of my shaft with at least 2” of stretched out ligaments dangling between this point and the pubic bone?

Why do I not see that? or anything remotely like that? I have a very similar erection angle to what I started with and no signs of stretched out suspensory ligs.

It would seem to me that my growth has occurred between the attachment point and the glans, not between the attachment point and anywhere inside my body.

This is why no one should pay any attention at all to the LOT theory because it has no basis in physiologic reality.

This has been my opinion for some time yet I still see it coming up CONSTANTLY in threads and many seem to defend it with an almost blind faith.

Although, no one seems to want to defend it at the moment. ;)

Merry Christmas WestLA-90069 and everyone else! :)

The suspensory ligaments must attach somewhere.

I Have extra inch and a half since I started. Where did the attachment point disappear to?

And I still have substantial ligament soreness after sessions, especially after fulcrum hanging.

Suspensory ligaments hold the penis up. It’s a total myth that they prevent “inner” penis from coming out. PE forums are now well over a decade old and still people bang on and an about ligs, as if they are related to length gains.

When suspensory ligs are cut, the penis drops down from the pubic bone and hangs at a lower angle. This is why people having this surgery see flaccid gains straight away. If the ligs were really holding the length of the erect penis back, then that too would be evident straight after surgery. The fact that erect length doesn’t change, should tell everyone that the ligs themselves aren’t significant to what we are trying to achieve (assuming erect gains are what most want).

Cutting the ligs does not allow more of the penis to be pulled out over time. The penis that is still “inside” is firmly attached by other ligaments and if they were stretched the penis would point downwards when erect and make penetration difficult.

Basically forget LOT and all the hundreds of discussions about targeting the ligs. If you want a longer flaccid, then target ligs are get them cut. But this doesn’t aid erect gains. Hence things like fulcrum stretches, Mems rapids gains and V stretches etc are all very effective for length. Some extenders even come with instructions advising people to wear them pointing upwards. There is a mountain of evidence which suggests the total insignificance of ligs, yet somehow they are still one of the most spoken about parts of PE. The fact the damn things can be totally cut and have no effect on erect length at all should at least raise suspicion!

Good logical deduction Joey.

Fulcrum hanging has jump started my length gains.

I think I might actually have hit 7 1/2” but I’m cautious to measure just yet.

I remember seeing a documentary about that guys who would go out have a surgery and get his ligs cut. He had significant flaccid gain, but no erect gain. He would have to wear an extender for months afterward so he can see erect gains.