Talking with a girl about the average size

Shiver,
I agree that black men are showers, but I still beleive race has little to do with erect size on the average. I seen many surveys that prove erect lengths are pretty much the same across nationalities. All around the 6” mark. If asians are smaller it wouldn’t be because of their race but because they are generally smaller people and so would have generally proportional penis’, whereas black people can very alot in height, I see many black guys who are quite a bit shorter than me, but I’m sure those 6’5”+ black guys are packin some insane sausage. I think just as hands go, in general they are proportional to your body, sure there are shorter guys who are hung, but in general body parts are proportional.

Beenthere,
It’ll be interesting to find out.

I believe that black men tend to overpopulate the large end of the scale, and white men tend to overpopulate the low end of the scale - in other words, if you have a crowd of men and it’s revealed that one of them is a legitimate 10’er, I’d bet that he’s black; and if you heard that one was 4.75”, I’d suspect that he’s white (or Asian).

Across the board, however, I think the most populous mid-range is rather similar in size (some white guys bigger than some black guys, some Asian guys bigger than some white or black guys, etc. - And most studies tend to bear this out). I would also agree that blacks tend to be showers, not growers.

However, in proportion to body size, I strongly disagree. I’m like a freakin’ bear (6-4, 280 lbs, huge wrists, hands, feet, very thick & dense bones, etc.) - and my meat was depressingly “common.” That was my Achilles Heel. It’s like that guy said in that link that Thunder posted (about the terribly botched phalloplasty): “I’m average sized, but as a big guy, average looks small on me.”

Hands and feet, and other skeletal structures, may be somewhat proportional to body size, but the soft tissues are not. You can’t determine the size of a man’s dick, nose, ears or lips based on his height (btw, my nose & ears are kinda small, my lips roughly average). Those “appendages” are really not dependent on skeletal structure at all. I’ve known short little guys with big noses, big ears, etc. The dick has nothing to do with height or shoe size. BELIEVE ME :( As a big former bodybuilder with a size 14 shoe, I lived under that fucking shadow all through my youth. Chicks would look at my hands & feet, and their minds would go right into the gutter. They giggle, wink, even talk out loud amongst themselves in front of me.and I’d think, “Oh, shit,” and want to slither away under some rock. I could’ve well put up with the big feet jokes when I was young if I could’ve whipped out my cock and said, “Big feet, big meat.”

I agree.with your statement bout skeletal structures being in proportion to each other and soft tissues not!

Take 1000 men that are 5ft tall and 1000 men that are 6ft tall. I speculate that the 1000 men at 6ft tall will have a larger average girth and length than the averages of the men at 5ft tall.

Based on what? There is no definitive statistical data for penis length/girth. There sure as hell isn’t any definitive statistical data disproving a link between body type/size and penis size.

Sure you’ve seen big guys with small penises, but have you taken the time to measure the erections of say 1000 men and plot penis size relative to height/broadness of shoulders/wrist size/arm length/leg length/foot size/etc?

It’s great that people ‘think’ these things are true and it’s great that people aren’t necessarily buying into stereotypes. But in all reality, we know jack all and we’re just speculating.

So.. Here’s my speculation:

Take 1000 men that are 5ft tall and 1000 men that are 6ft tall. I speculate that the 1000 men at 6ft tall will have a larger average girth and length than the averages of the men at 5ft tall.

Sorry to disappoint, but my dear friend and biomedical engineering prof at University of California San Diego and now at UVa pressed this theory for a recent paper by comparing over 3500 college guys who volunteered for his scientific survey. His results were that body height does not have any correlation to the penis size. A colleague of his in England came to a very similar conclusion as well.

Sorry to disappoint, but my dear friend and biomedical engineering prof at University of California San Diego and now at UVa pressed this theory for a recent paper by comparing over 3500 college guys who volunteered for his scientific survey. His results were that body height does not have any correlation to the penis size. A colleague of his in England came to a very similar conclusion as well.

Sorry to disappoint, but my dear friend and biomedical engineering prof at University of California San Diego and now at UVa pressed this theory for a recent paper by comparing over 3500 college guys who volunteered for his scientific survey. His results were that body height does not have any correlation to the penis size. A colleague of his in England came to a very similar conclusion as well.