Originally Posted by LookingForSize
Who the hell knows what methods were used on that survey. To even be close to accurate, they need to be clear on the method to do the measuring.
My thoughts also. It seems they were assuming visual is dick size and everyone would realise it!? Perhaps the general public does only think about the nbp as actual dick size, and so perhaps the votes there are probably nbp—-but how are we to know? I would bet most votes were nbp, some bp, some incorrectly measured by those that don’t know how to properly, and some just outright tacking on of size. Is multiple voting possible? If so, perhaps a penis growth pill company would love to raise the average and increase insecurities.
Much better are Thunder’s pre pe bpel and pre pe girth polls. The participants are more aware of correct measurement technique, and there are going to be far fewer exaggerators, and multiple voting by one person isn’t allowed. IMO, even Thunder’s polls aren’t definitive though, as guys with big dicks are less likely to seek out a PE forum, and also because there doesn’t seem to be a proportional sampling of men from around this planet. Also, the girth poll is probably a mix of thickest place on shaft measurements by some, and strictly mid shaft measurements by others.