Utilizing LOT better?

Ok I’ve been thinking a little bit. I have an LOT of about 8. This means that, when I’m erect and at 9 o’clock and above, the restraining factor on my length is not my ligs, but my tunica, because my ligs do not take over until the 8 o’clock position. I’ve been doing a lot of downward stretching, mainly because I’ve gathered that 8 is a pretty high LOT. But if I want erect gains, shouldn’t I be stretching above my LOT because my erection angle is above my LOT?

I don’t know if this is exactly what Bib was referring to, but it seems to me that the best way to apply his LOT theory is the find whether or not you have a loss of tugback at your erection level. If you do, stretch the tunica (up). If you don’t, stretch the ligs. This means that, even if you have an LOT of 8 or 9 or maybe even above, you should be mainly stretching upward, until your LOT increases even further, and your erect lenth is inhibited by your ligs. Make any sense?

Obi,

>Make any sense?<

No.

What does erection angle have to do with LOT?

Bigger

Bib,

I mean that at 9 o’clock, the angle of a straight erection, my ligs aren’t being pulled at all, if I’ve interpreted your LOT theory right. I experience tugback at 9 o’clcok, meaning that my tunica is being maxed out at 9 instead of my ligs. I’ve actually noticed that my downward measurement is longer than my straight out, which is longer than my upward measurement.

It makes sense to me, but I could be wrong if the ligs aren’t stretched at 9 and above no matter what. See why? Maybe you could help clarify this.

The fact that my straight measurement is shorter than my downward is what prompted this thought. I don’t care how big I am except how big I am when erect and at 9 or above. What’s the point of stretching the ligs into oblivion if the tunica inhibits these gains at the erection level?

Obi, I think you need to read about the LOT theory one more time.