What percentile is 8X6?

Remember to account for the difference in measuring. As MDC here stated ,these results used the non-bone pressed method (at least in the Kinsey study). Therefore you should do the same if you want to calculate your “true” percentile.

That’s correct, and a good thing to keep in mind when deciding where you fit on the scale. I say I’m in the top 10% rather than 5% because of this.

What you need to do here is determine what percentage of those that are 8EG or more possess a 6EG or more and then multiply that result by .02,
i.e., your estimate of .01 (8x6) infers that .50 of all those 8EL or more possess a 6EG or more.

The .05 figure for those with 6EG or more does not really help us here because it refers not only to those with 8EL or more but also those with less than 8EL as well.

Of course you can always figure out what percentage of those with 6EG or more are 8EL or more and muliply that result by .05

In that case, your .01 estimate infers that .20 of all those with 6EG or more have a 8EL or more.

Either way…the result will be the same. :)

Yes, I noted too that the guys in this thread were referring to 8” NBPEL, which for me anyways is a far cry from 8” BPEL. At 7.5” BPEL, I’m only 6.5” NBPEL. I think this puts me back into the 50 percentile or something like that…. Oh well.

For some reason, hanging gives me girth. Along with my last 1/8” in length, I’ve gotten my second 1/4’ girth gain from just hanging over the past month. So now I’m 6.5”NBPEL by 5.75”EG and my meathood is starting to look a little weird if you ask me. LOL. I guess you never know what’s gonna happen in this sport.

I believe this would place you at above average body fat percentage. Lose some weight and you might up that 6.5NBP to 7NBP.

I think some of us have a large difference between BPEL and NBP, because of PE pulling the skin away from the body rather than high body fat. Pre-PE, the difference for me was about 1/2”, now it’s an inch.

supersizeit,
My assumption on those percentages was that 1/2 of the 8” length guys were under 6” girth. I did say it was my guess, but I think it’s a reasonable assumption.

I also think its a reasonable assumption…it sounds like a good ballpark figure to me without any statistical research. :)

I’m a 5’9” bodybuilder with a 31” waist and not a heck of a lot of fat on me. If I were a doughboy I could just lose weight. But for some reason, I’ve always had that pad there and it never goes away, even when I get cut up for the Florida summer. And I’ve never been over 32” waist even at my current 190 pounds. I guess I could do spot lipo… Anyone else here had it done?

bigplug,
Have you considered trying a yohimbe transdermal? It’s supposedly somewhat effective for spot reduction if your BF% is already low. These aren’t my claims, but what I’ve read from bodybuilders. Regardless of what you think of it’s possible effectiveness, it’s doesn’t cost anything compared to surgery.

I wonder if it would be a good thing not to have it.

I’m at about the top 80% then :D

If 8”+ males are so rare, then half of them must be porn stars. :)

teoman:

and the other half must be here at Thunder’s :)

yes, sure :)

The Kinsey study’s methods were totally unscientific, therefore I would not legitimize their result. From what I have read, all the other studies cited BPEL not NBPEL. I think “average” size accepted by uroligist is 5.1 inches, must be NBPEL though.