Originally Posted by damianromante
Is nutrition science a thing?What I don’t like is how something is “recommended” as the new healthy option then later reversed. Is any of this subject to the scientific method or are nutritionist just lone wolves espousing ideas.
Examples: Back in the 90’s bodybuilders were all about carbing up. Fast-forward to today and many from that period struggle with diabetes, obesity, and heart issues. More recently, soy milk was all the rave in the mid 2000’s (2005-2009). Then it became a no because of it’s impact on estrogen levels. Was any of this subject to the scientific method or no?
I’ve long (six months ago) come to understand that the issue with PE is it that success may not be repeatable. So no doctor is going to put, at a very minimum, his/her reputation on the line for it.
Well first of all, take bodybuilders out of the equation for recommending nutrition lol. Specially in America, a bodybuilder is the definition of a loser, and the vast majority of them never even went to college.
Besides that, the “recommendations” come from Allopathic MD. And average MD has 6 months of nutrition in medical school. Thats it. He has no knowledge nor training in nutritional science for a very simple reason. Is not his/her field. That is why.
Does nutritional science exist? ABSOLUTELY, and the field that covers that is Naturopathic Medicine. That field of medicine is the one that research and study nutritional science and have all the data to prevent, manage, reverse and cure chronic symptoms and diseases while optimizing health overall.
Period 1: 06/08/2020 BPFSL: 22cm (8.66") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 09/07/2020 BPFSL: 23.9cm (9.40")
Period 2: 05/01/2021 BPFSL: 24cm (9.44") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 07/24/2021 BPFSL: 25.4cm (10.00") BPEL: 23.5cm (9.25")
Goal: 1 Foot x 7.5 Inches (30.48cm x 19.05cm) NBPEL