Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Which to get, spring vs non spring loaded

Which to get, spring vs non spring loaded

Size Matters Penis Enlarger VS CalExotic’s Penis Extender the Calexotics I can get for $15 cheaper and has a max extension of 6.5” it doesn’t look like I could but a rod froma store and cut to length I want, but that said its not spring loaded I don’t think whats better these screw ones or spring loaded. ?


Not really a signature but a link to a great guide Newbie Routine Steady Progress Chart.

Never seen the screw type before, but I thought up a similar type of extender years ago… cool to see it exists now.

I tried using a noose strap extender once. What I learned from that is that extending is only as effective as it is comfortable - if you can’t wear it at a high enough tension to stretch past BPEL, it is worthless.

So as long as you can stretch past BPEL and keep it there for hours, either extension method should get you results. Just be sure to track your progress.


[start] 10.15 cubic inches

[goal] 20.3 cubic inches

I say buy the first one since it is the most similar to the andropenis which was used in this study https://onlinel ibrary.wiley.co … 0X.2008.08083.x . Read the study there is no mention of BPEL or extension of stretch just 600gr also you can see the first month is where people had the most gains. So probably stay there as long as you can, I increased the tension and saw slower gains just like the study. I also suggest you take a 3 month layoff if you have seen any gains before starting the use of an extender.

“Read the study there is no mention of BPEL or extension of stretch”

These studies are always poorly constructed.

For example: Why do they only measure flaccid (which can vary based on elements as fickle as temperature and mood) and stretched (which doesn’t necessarily correlate with erect gains)?

Since these studies are carried out by doctors who are not immersed in PE communities, they don’t seem to know which questions they ought to be answering.

There is no reason why a spring system which exerts 600 grams of force to produce 0.5” of stretch would work better than a screw system which one can crank to 0.5” of stretch (and thereby produce 600 grams of force). As long as the force and/or extension is countable and the extender is comfortable, either is fine.

“you can see the first month is where people had the most gains. So probably stay there as long as you can, I increased the tension and saw slower gains just like the study.”

It is unsurprising that most gains would happen at the first period. Increasing the tension would not be the reason for slower gains, the reason would be that their newbie gains had been exhausted… At least, that seems a lot more plausible to me.

It is also worth noting that they only gained 1.7 cm FSL for the whole 6-month period. It doesn’t seem clear that this is bone-pressed, either, so perhaps being more aware of their bodies and general health/distraction from food led to weight loss, and the “increase” is mostly pubic fat shrinking. Again, poor study construction, and not really clear about its results.


[start] 10.15 cubic inches

[goal] 20.3 cubic inches

You might be right 2xthevol but to put it into perspective it’s your logic against mine, your word against mine thats how most of these discussions work in the PE comunity and anyone can write anything and have gained.What I am trying to do is say not only have I had this experience, but this study correlates with what happened to me.

“There is no reason why a spring system which exerts 600 grams of force to produce 0.5” of stretch would work better than a screw system which one can crank to 0.5” of stretch (and thereby produce 600 grams of force).”Logic changes with knowledge ,there are many variables to take into account just like bodybuilding.If you were only to take into account the stretch as a major variable than hanging would produce results one hundred percent of time which they don’t.Yes maybe the screw system could work even better.I myself just used a rope and a water bottle. My opinion is simply that the first one looked more similar to the one used in a study so why not keep things as similar as possible.

“It is unsurprising that most gains would happen at the first period. Increasing the tension would not be the reason for slower gains, the reason would be that their newbie gains had been exhausted… At least, that seems a lot more plausible to me.”Yes it is unsurprising, I am not saying don’t increase the tension but rather wait a little longer and see if you produce more gains, if not he can simply increase the tension and would obviously gain if that was the main factor.If he sees no increase in size after an increase in tension that might give hime food for thought.
Like with all studies I just take into account the results which are scrutinized, the conclusions are only a guideline in my opinion.Its not that it was poorly constructed it’s just that they got the results they were looking for.The general medical consensus for measuring would be NBP and I gained a similar amount with an equal amount of calories.

My point is that a penis doesn’t know whether a force is coming from a screw or a spring.

If you’re applying the same amount of stretch in the same direction with the same grip on the penis for the same amount of time, the results will be identical.

There is no physically possible reason why they wouldn’t be.


[start] 10.15 cubic inches

[goal] 20.3 cubic inches

Top
Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
Spring Gowthuser13Penis Enlargement Basics1201-19-2007 01:10 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:25 PM.