“Read the study there is no mention of BPEL or extension of stretch”
These studies are always poorly constructed.
For example: Why do they only measure flaccid (which can vary based on elements as fickle as temperature and mood) and stretched (which doesn’t necessarily correlate with erect gains)?
Since these studies are carried out by doctors who are not immersed in PE communities, they don’t seem to know which questions they ought to be answering.
There is no reason why a spring system which exerts 600 grams of force to produce 0.5” of stretch would work better than a screw system which one can crank to 0.5” of stretch (and thereby produce 600 grams of force). As long as the force and/or extension is countable and the extender is comfortable, either is fine.
“you can see the first month is where people had the most gains. So probably stay there as long as you can, I increased the tension and saw slower gains just like the study.”
It is unsurprising that most gains would happen at the first period. Increasing the tension would not be the reason for slower gains, the reason would be that their newbie gains had been exhausted… At least, that seems a lot more plausible to me.
It is also worth noting that they only gained 1.7 cm FSL for the whole 6-month period. It doesn’t seem clear that this is bone-pressed, either, so perhaps being more aware of their bodies and general health/distraction from food led to weight loss, and the “increase” is mostly pubic fat shrinking. Again, poor study construction, and not really clear about its results.