Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

BIB Has Spoken... A New Hanging Technique Is Born In 2006!

In addition to a second rice sock, a hot water bottle, hot towel wrap or IR lamp can be used to apply heat to the top of the tunica.


originally: 6.5" BPEL x 5.0" EG (ms); currently: 9.825" BPEL x 6.825" EG (ms)

Hidden details: Finding xeno: a penis tale; Some photos: Tiger

Tell me, o monks; what cannot be achieved through efforts. - Siddhartha Gautama

Originally Posted by iamaru
Originally Posted by Mr. Fantastic
I’ve got a beanbag bear here that I’ve been using in place of the rice-sock described…it just happens to be the right shape.

Yea right ya perv. ;)

No, really…it hugs my balls so there’s a space for them! (is that…wrong?) :p :leftie:

Awesome…just to get in the book..Lets make big gains in 2006. Stay focused and determined


Started :BPEL 7.0 x 5.5 Now: BPEL 7.6 x 5.8 Goal: NBPEL 8.6 x 6.3 "Don´t let yourself get attached to anything that you are Not willing to walk out on in 30 seconds flat if you feel the HEAT around th corner." --Robert De Niro (talking to Al Pacino in a caffe in the Movie HEAT)

So the principe is heat applied to fulcrum hanging?

I think it is more that it is a comfortable fulcrum, that also happens to be a heating device as well.

Originally Posted by hooker
Awesome…just to get in the book..Lets make big gains in 2006. Stay focused and determined

Amen brother. :)

So who has had success engineering one of these devices ? People like me are still confused. Mr.fantastic have you made one ? One of ya’ll should make some and sell it .. Lovemachine and fantastic ,, please pm me .. Thanks

Ok, so does any one have a new diagram or picture of an actual one? I don’t get it.

I’ve been experimenting with it and here’s a new diagram.

The plastic side of the rice-sock stops the BibHanger’s skids from digging in to the rice-sock. This keeps the BibHanger level/horizontal, which creates a double-fulcrum.

Also— the rice sock is much more comfortable than the average ‘traditional’ fulcrum and can be heated (if constructed with the correct type of tape).

Please Note: I think a lot of the confusion over the efficacy of this method is due to the fact that the double-fulcrum can only be achieved with a BibHanger (as far as I know).

Here’s the key to the picture below:

1. Penis

2. Rice-sock

3. BibHanger (Kept horizontal by leverage against the plastic side of the rice-sock (creating double-fulcrum))

4. Plastic side of Rice-sock

5. Seat


Last edited by Mr. Fantastic : 01-29-2006 at .

Thanks a lot for your efforts with the diagrams guys!

I think it is hard now not to understand the basic idea.

Mr. Fantastic, thank you for the diagram. I can now see how this could work!

The downward weight or force F creates a tensile force T in the penis between the hanger and the body. T will be equal to F/tanA, where A is the angle between the line of the penis and a line substended from where the weight is applied on the hanger to where the hanger pivots on the hard plastic.

When angle A is 45’ then T=F but as you decrease angle A then T becomes bigger and bigger!


Feb 2004 BPEL 6.7" NBPEL ???? BPFSL ???? EG 5.65" Feb 2005 BPEL 7.1" NBPEL 5.8" BPFSL 6.9" EG 5.8" Feb 2006 BPEL 7.3" NBPEL 5.8" BPFSL 7.6" EG 5.85" Feb 2007 BPEL 7.3" NBPEL 5.8" BPFSL 7.5" EG 5.9"

Good point, MBUC ! The hanger and hard plastic piece form a lever for multiplying the force applied to the shaft.


Enter your measurements in the PE Database.

Here’s my reasoning about how this works.

fulcrumforces0004.webp
(22.7 KB, 1522 views)

Feb 2004 BPEL 6.7" NBPEL ???? BPFSL ???? EG 5.65" Feb 2005 BPEL 7.1" NBPEL 5.8" BPFSL 6.9" EG 5.8" Feb 2006 BPEL 7.3" NBPEL 5.8" BPFSL 7.6" EG 5.85" Feb 2007 BPEL 7.3" NBPEL 5.8" BPFSL 7.5" EG 5.9"

Originally Posted by mbuc
Here’s my reasoning about how this works.

Makes sense to me. :confused:

I forgot how to calculate moments, but that looks right. It looks like the rice sock is a minor player in this system. The main idea is to create a hard stop for the hanger to prevent it from slipping backwards, and then to torgue the hanger down. The resulting leverage multiplies the force applied to the penis.

My question is, how is this different from simply using more weight? I guess the induced moment may focus the force onto the dorsal surface, but only if the hanger dips down in front. Agree?

To the penis, the real issue is not how much weight is used, but how much force is applied. Do you think this arrangment spares the penis from the assaults induced by heavy weights, simply because it uses less weight and more force? Or is it basically equivalent?


Enter your measurements in the PE Database.

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:54 AM.