RB,
> Bib, what do you think causes the refractory reflex? For instance, I was doing a 20 minute set of DLD blasters this am, things were going really good the first 15 minutes, getting a great stretch on the rk, then when I moved to the last 5 minutes, it was like I hit a switch or something and my ligs didn’t want to stretch at all, like they were working against me. Perhaps I had worked to the end of the line as far as the elastin properties are concerned and was putting too much stress on the collagenous fibers? It was really strange, and my dick still doesn’t feel like it wants to get as long erect as it should…<
By “refractory reflex”, do you mean the inability to stretch the ligs further, or the inability to get an erection soon after stretching?
If the first, hobby’s siting and his explanation above explained it very well. As the lig is stretched, the fluids move out of the tissues, allowing for the stretch until equilibrium. Then the load is solely on the actual collagenous tissues. With extended stretch, the bonds begin to fail.
>I wonder when you guys hang, is most of the hanging done with the collagenous fibers fully supporting the weight, or do you stay just below this level? <
I don’t really know what this means. Other than the skin, the collagenous fibers will always take almost all the stress, whatever that level might be. The softer inner tissues will take a little of the stress, but not much.
Hobby,
>You were beyond stretching the elastin components exclusively. Visualize a fiber as a chain of stiff bungee cords with lightweight, extremely stretchy springs connecting them. The springs are elastin, and they easily extend to their full length (or do they?). You were past that, and hitting the tougher collagenous bungee cords.<
I believe the fibers are interwoven with each other, elastin and collagen. The elastin fibers tend to ‘pull up’ the collagen fibers slightly. So when a load is applied, the elastin stretches easily, thereby applying the entire load to the collagen fibers. This is probably exactly what you were saying.
>I suspect the “different elastic modulus” indicated in the paper simply means at low tension it lengthens more than ligs that are less elastic. Duh! High-elastin ligs probably deform plastically under an appropriate load much the same as ligs containing less elastin.<
I believe that is correct.
Bigger