Chemical PE: The Long Awaited Evidence

Ok, sorry for the sarcasm. But there isn’t any personal attack here, at least from my part. London100’ attacks, not a big issue. He’s young and I have thick skin.

I personally have enjoyed following the thread. More interesting than your average thread and I think the two are actually enjoying themselves to see who will get the other to yield each point first. So far it is a tie. I think they are getting close to agree to disagree.

“How can I be on better behavior when I am already perfect?”

If you use that as a justification for not being more polite in this thread we are going to have a problem. None of the mods are going to play the never ending back and forth game that london has been willing to do with you.

I don’t care what you call it, it needs to stop now. If you truly can not see what we have a problem with, please, just take our word for it and stop posting in this thread.

If you want to force a mod to go back and itemize things that might be taken as being mean, and hence a violation of the forum guidelines, I will go ahead and do it. BUT…

For every one that the other mods agree is bad behavior you get a day in the drunk tank. Pretty sure you would get a week plus. Like I wrote above, I really don’t want to play the never ending back and forth ego game.

The ones you’ve been making.

I see nothing to “Lol” about.

Exactly.

Thing is, when you stick to the facts it’s really helpful and informative. You know a lot. Your arguments, unto themselves, are more than enough. You don’t need to take cheap shots and make little digs.

You undercut the points you make when you do that, and it distracts us from otherwise cogent and highly intelligent posts.

Even with English as a second language you should know well enough by now what not to post. So do yourself, and the rest of us, a favor: go back to the facts. That’s where you have the most to offer this forum.

If not… see if any of us are bluffing. The ice is very thin right about now.

Dude, do you know what? You are not helping. London100 started all this bitching after yours ‘signal’
Mr. Happy - Chemical PE: The Long Awaited Evidence

as other posters have observed, there isn’t any frightful personal attack here, just yours willing to find excuses to start a bitching. You are messing this thread with yours envy guys, that’s all.

‘The ice is thin?’. To me? Do you think you are speaking to a newbie troll? Oh, do whatever you want guys, harm the forum for yours own ego if you like. I had enough shit around here for nothing back.

Have you found a way to write down your stats without messing them, Mr. ‘I have a 160 IQ’?
/pedata/data.ph … username=iamaru

That’s my call also dt. Maybe it will get back to that soon.

marinera, if you are asserting that you are not making personal attacks, this does not help your case.

It’s also off-topic for the thread. Can we try to go back to discussing chemical PE, or if we can’t, just leave the poor thread alone?

Thanks for your opinion, Lampwick. We were on topic, actually, before some old mods jumped on here like elephants. Thanks for working on killing this thread guys.
:up:

‘Does not help your cause’. Uhm…you were missing the lynching party?

FYI, the one who said he has an IQ of 160 is Iamaru himself. He said that many times in public forums. Do a search and you’ll find the posts.

Calling iamaru “Mr. ‘I have a 160 IQ’ ” looks like “Aggression or annoyance towards any member whether in forums or private messages”, and an personal attack. It’s going to be difficult to convince anyone that referring to iamaru in that way is a friendly reference.

Well if he says repeteadly that he has an IQ of 160 (without anyone asking about, by the way) than I don’t see any “Aggression or annoyance” or personal attack. I call him as he advertise himself, so to speak, so basically it is a friendly reference - way more friendly than Mods’ posts toward me, for comparison.

Fucking kids. All you had better settle down. If this shit migrates out of this thread I’ll start handing out the vacations.

And cancel recess.