Originally Posted by fourofakind
Well thank you for the links. What I was really hoping for was your perspective / analysis as a physiologist about what is happening in the tissue and thus how it relates to your goal of PE. Not purely for a theoretical exercise. As far as I know, such an analysis does not exist online. I guess I am puzzled by your lack of interest as a physiologist in harms way. Nevertheless, life is full of mysteries.
First, I was a physiologist from 1983-1989, but my field of research was not my dick but pulmonary physiology - at that time.
Second, now, my field of research is indeed the development of my dick with nice progress taking place, but - to tell you the truth - I am getting a little unpatient. Research of dick development, however, is empirical (trial and error) rather then true scientific studies (I opened a thread into this topic but very few were interested in that - so I gave up more or less and am doing the same what most guys are doing in here: concentrate on your own dick and communicate what I am doing with others (input of mods/vets/even newbies always appreciated).
Third, I am not exactly sure what you want to know exactly. We know, that cortisone, injected into a tendon has a tendency to weaken the tendon’s tensile strength. This translates for me into more length gain a the same hang time x weight. An other effect could be partial or complete rupture of the ligament or avulsion from the pubic bone due to collagen damage / tissue necrosis (= tissue death). As I explained before, this would be an undesired effect in the treatment of - let’s say - an athlete with a sport injury. In the case of a pe-addict it would basically result in the same as penis lengthening surgery, which involves dissection of the ligaments. While I have never considered to undergo penile surgery because I really love sex and would hate to damage my dick due to operation complication, I am accepting the risk if complete lig. Failure (=rupture). Because in this case one would obtain the endpoint of the surgery without the risks associated with surgery.
The other issue would be local infection as a side effect of cortisone injection as a result of locally decreased immune response. That could be a disaster. That’s why I am repeating that the injection technique is so important (absolutely sterile). In my clinical work I have performed about 3,000 corticosteroid injections. I am a meticulous worker, these injections were at the central nervous system (spine) with potentially disastrous effects, a risk that I hav to undergo with my patients every day in my clinical work. I never had that type of complication - so I feel relatively comfortable.
Fourofakind - please feel free to ask more specifically if that is not the answer to your question. I will try to ask - however, if you are interested in the molecular or biochemical processes involved - that I would not be able to answer and - truly - this is not something I am interested in in general (btw - this is not something physiologists are interested in general, rather biochemistry people; anyhow, I am practicing clinical radiology and nuclear medicine now - and the focus is on clinical: if it works, it’s ok, if it doesn’t - dump it; just like empirical pe-research).
Let me know your thoughts and/or further questions.