Average penis size table

02-10-2018, 05:49 PM

Lenny

Average penis size table

Average penis size	Flaccid length	Flaccid stretched length	Erect length	Flaccid circumference	Erect circumference	Samples
Loeb 1899	3.70”	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	50
Schonfeld and Bebe 1942	n/a	5.15”	n/a	3.34”	6.22”	196
Kinsey 1948	3.81”	6.59”	n/a	n/a	n/a	2,770
Dickinson 1949	3.93”	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	1,500
Muangman 1978	n/a	n/a	4.44”	n/a	n/a	527
Ajmani et al. 1985	3.21”	n/a	n/a	3.47”	n/a	320
Jamison and Gebhard 1988	3.89”	n/a	6.21”	3.75”	4.85”	3,500
Bondil et al. 1991	4.22”	6.59”	n/a	n/a	n/a	905
da Ros 1992	n/a	n/a	5.70”	n/a	4.37”	150
Siminoski, Bain 1993	n/a	3.70”	n/a	n/a	n/a	63
Janssen 1994	n/a	n/a	n/a	n/a	4.80”	74
Richters J 1995	n/a	n/a	6.29”	n/a	5.31”	156
Wessells et al. 1996	3.48”	4.90”	6.20”	n/a	4.84”	80
Coxon 1996	n/a	n/a	6.25”	n/a	n/a	420
Smith AM 1998	n/a	n/a	6.18”	n/a	5.19”	184
Richard Edwards 1998	3.38”	n/a	6.37”	n/a	5.03”	2,545
Han 1999	n/a	n/a	5.00”	n/a	4.25”	1,999
Acuna y Villalba 1999	4.13”	n/a	5.47”	n/a	n/a	130
Pagani 1999	n/a	n/a	5.70”	n/a	n/a	246
Bogaert 1999	4.09”	n/a	6.45”	3.83”	4.94”	935
Bogaert 1999	3.87”	n/a	6.14”	3.70”	4.79”	4,187
Durex 1999	n/a	n/a	6.29”	n/a	5.11”	3,000
J Chen et al. 2000	3.27”	n/a	5.35”	n/a	4.29”	55
Lifestyles Condoms 2001	n/a	n/a	5.87”	n/a	4.97”	300
Hosp. Domingo L. de Caracas 2001	3.74”	n/a	5.00”	n/a	n/a	590
Schneider et al. 2001	3.39”	n/a	5.70”	n/a	4.88”	111
Ponchietti et al. 2001	3.54”	4.92”	n/a	3.93”	n/a	3,300
Sengezer et al. 2002	2.67”	3.53”	5.01”	n/a	n/a	200
Shah J 2002	n/a	n/a	5.11”	n/a	n/a	104
Savoie et al. 2003	3.66”	6.88”	n/a	3.70”	n/a	124
Son H 2003	2.71”	n/a	3.77”	n/a	n/a	123
Awwad et al. 2004	3.66”	5.31”	n/a	3.50”	n/a	271
Spyropoulos et al. 2005	n/a	4.79”	n/a	3.41”	n/a	52
Mehraban et al. 2006	n/a	4.55”	n/a	3.40”	n/a	1,500
Orakwe JC 2006	n/a	n/a	5.27”	n/a	n/a	115
Promodu et al. 2007	3.23”	4.28”	5.09”	3.59”	4.52”	301
Inst. fuer Kondom-Beratung 2008	n/a	n/a	5.62”	n/a	4.60”	10,477
Kamel et al. 2009	n/a	5.07”	n/a	n/a	n/a	949
Tomova et al. 2010 G2	3.60”	n/a	n/a	3.72”	n/a	310
Tomova et al. 2010 G3	3.57”	n/a	n/a	3.63”	n/a	310
Tomova et al. 2010 G4	3.76”	n/a	n/a	3.80”	n/a	310
Söylemez et al. 2011	3.52”	5.50”	n/a	3.50”	n/a	2,276
Choi et al. 2011	3.03”	4.60”	n/a	n/a	n/a	144
Aslan et al. 2011	3.66”	5.39”	n/a	n/a	n/a	1,132
Shahid Khan 2011	4.01”	n/a	5.62”	n/a	4.80”	609
Dr. Vijayasarathi Ramanathan 2013	n/a	n/a	5.55”	n/a	3.11”	1,670
Chrouser et al. 2013	n/a	4.52”	n/a	3.42”	n/a	253
Shalaby et al. 2014	n/a	5.44”	n/a	n/a	n/a	2,000
Herbenick et al. 2014	n/a	n/a	5.57”	n/a	4.81”	1,661
Chen et al. 2014	2.55”	5.07”	5.07”	3.14”	4.13”	311
The Definitive Penis Size Survey 2014	3.4”	n/a	6.4”	n/a	5.0”	2,545
Veale et al. 2015	3.60”	5.21”	5.16”	3.66”	4.59”	15,521
Habous et al. 2015	n/a	n/a	5.64”	n/a	4.52”	778
juiice 2016 (Thunder’s Place)	n/a	n/a	6.35”	n/a	5.01”	n/a
TheyFit	n/a	n/a	5.11”	n/a	4.68”	20,000
Tenga	n/a	n/a	5.35”	n/a	4.37”	500,000
Harding	n/a	n/a	6.02”	n/a	4.92”	556

Start 6.8” x 4.7” (4.9" BEG)

Latest 8.2” x 5.1” (5.3" BEG)

My pictures

Last edited by Lenny : 02-11-2018 at 01:28 PM. Reason: Updated

02-10-2018, 10:09 PM

BeardedDragon

BP or NBP? Just kidding.

Very nice work.

Before 5.5" x 4.1" ///////// Now 7.4" x 4.9"

02-10-2018, 10:24 PM

Lenny

Thanks Dragon, was planning to add more columns for this, age, location and standard deviation… but will be too loaded.

The idea was to keep simpler without stretched length and samples, but ended up clean and easy on the eyes. Also thought in blending this into the older related thread that we’ve got, but wanted to keep in inches and a bit less confusing.

Start 6.8” x 4.7” (4.9" BEG)

Latest 8.2” x 5.1” (5.3" BEG)

My pictures

02-10-2018, 10:33 PM

BeardedDragon

It is quite amazing to see all of the studies compiled with the numbers right next to each other. Barring a few outliers the stats are clear. It really puts into perspective the sizes we reach by PE methods.

Before 5.5" x 4.1" ///////// Now 7.4" x 4.9"

02-11-2018, 01:23 AM

thoughtfulgold

I always speak of 8x6 as absolutely insane. Because it is.

Now: 9" BPEL x 6.25" MSEG as of 11/10/2019 This is my story, a few progress pics of me here, and all my methods.

Then: 6.25" x 4.37" in 8/2009 Are you new to PE? Here's some advice I wish someone had given me when I first started.

My Extender and forward to 10" and balls enhancement project. There is no "Holy Grail" of Penis Enlargement. Only time and effort works. I'm *10* years in and counting. All you have to do is put the work in and keep the faith.

02-11-2018, 01:57 AM

Justalilbit

Originally Posted by BeardedDragon

BP or NBP? Just kidding.
Very nice work.

You were joking, but I’d actually like to know lol. I assume they’re all BP measurements. Is this right?

02-11-2018, 02:04 AM

thoughtfulgold

Originally Posted by Justalilbit

You were joking, but I’d actually like to know lol. I assume they’re all BP measurements. Is this right?

Almost every survey is Bone Pressed. The surveys created the Bone Pressed standard as a medical standard for measurement.

Now: 9" BPEL x 6.25" MSEG as of 11/10/2019 This is my story, a few progress pics of me here, and all my methods.

Then: 6.25" x 4.37" in 8/2009 Are you new to PE? Here's some advice I wish someone had given me when I first started.

My Extender and forward to 10" and balls enhancement project. There is no "Holy Grail" of Penis Enlargement. Only time and effort works. I'm *10* years in and counting. All you have to do is put the work in and keep the faith.

02-11-2018, 02:44 AM

iceman67

Current: 7.5 BPEL, 6 BEG, 5.5 MSEG, 5 NBPFL, 5 FG, 8.25 BPFSL

Long term goal: 8 BPEL, 6 BEG, 6 MSEG, 5.5 NBPFL, 5 FG

02-11-2018, 02:52 AM

velhungvhite

Great post Lenny.

Is that erect circumference measurement from the Schonfeld and Bebe study correct? I can’t find the full text anywhere for free

02-11-2018, 03:13 AM

RomeoPlus

Thanks for compiling all that data, but what’s with the funky samples numbers?

I’m assuming that “2.770” you mean 2770 samples? But then at the bottom one study has 500.000 samples? Is that 500000 (ie half a million)? Wow.

02-11-2018, 01:22 PM

Lenny

velhungvhite, same here, couldn’t find the article. Old stuff is hard to find floating around the web. To be conclusive only with the study in hands, but over the web the numbers match.

RomeoPlus, sorry about that, locally we commonly use dot instead of comma, so a thousand is 1.000. Going to fix this, thanks!

Start 6.8” x 4.7” (4.9" BEG)

Latest 8.2” x 5.1” (5.3" BEG)

My pictures

02-12-2018, 04:09 AM

RomeoPlus

Thank you for changing that. :)

I’m still stunned about a study with half a million test subjects!

02-12-2018, 01:27 PM

Lenny

Tenga’s study was based on self-measured reports and their team admittedly excluded Africa and Latin America samples, assuming that in those place there are “real whoopers”.

Start 6.8” x 4.7” (4.9" BEG)

Latest 8.2” x 5.1” (5.3" BEG)

My pictures

02-12-2018, 04:20 PM

iceman67

Originally Posted by Lenny

Tenga’s study was based on self-measured reports and their team admittedly excluded Africa and Latin America samples, assuming that in those place there are “real whoopers”.

Well, that messed up the real results.

Current: 7.5 BPEL, 6 BEG, 5.5 MSEG, 5 NBPFL, 5 FG, 8.25 BPFSL

Long term goal: 8 BPEL, 6 BEG, 6 MSEG, 5.5 NBPFL, 5 FG

Similar Threads
Thread	Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Lengthening Shortened Penis Caused By Peyronie's...	penismith	Men's Sexual Health	4	09-05-2022 12:15 PM
CNN's view of average penis size and making it bigger!	regularwhiteguy	Penis Enlargement	189	07-16-2012 02:16 PM