Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Better For Sex: Cut or Uncut

Originally Posted by CIRP
Value to female partners. The foreskin has long been known to be valuable to the female partner. The presence of the foreskin is reported to be stimulating to the female. Women are more likely to experience vaginal dryness during sex with a circumcised partner. The unnatural dryness may make coitus painful and result in abrasions. The vaginal dryness may be mistakenly attributed to female arousal disorder. O’Hara & O’Hara report that the female partner is less likely to experience orgasm when the foreskin is not present and more likely to experience orgasm or even multiple orgasms when the foreskin is present.

From Foreskin Sexual Function/Circumcision Sexual Dysfunction

I can’t find any numbers but I recall a study claiming that a woman had a 68% higher chance on a orgasm if she had sex with an uncircumsised penis as opposed to a cut one. But I can’t say anything about how solid that study was. It still seems obvious that the foreskin has an effect on the pussy during fucking as it makes up about a quart to a third of a penis that is in the average range. Can’t expect that much loss off mass to go unnoticed.

Next insult traded and somebody goes on hold or they leave the building back to the subject nicely


I haven't failed, I've found 10,000 ways that don't work. Thomas Edison (1847-1931)

I was going to correct you on your glaring spelling errors and lack of proper grammar.

Then I was going to tell you to get over yourself if you were of the mindset that my response, five pages in, was magically directed towards you, because you may have started the discussion.

Then I was going to refer you to the Search Function, from which one can find as many topics devoted to Cut vs. Uncut as to fill one’s desires for all time.

I was even going to make a crack about you needed to reassure me that you, someone I’ve never met or even bothered to look at the name of, would be personally worried about my hot, steaming man-meat.

But, being a man, I am willing to forgive you for your agitated reply, and extend the olive branch to you.

In modern terms, I do believe this means, “Let’s sit’er down bud, crack open a few brewskies and watch the game!!”.

So, what do you say? *Cracks open a beer and hands it your way*

-Borat, hoping he didn’t just serve a minor

Hey johnny,

When you get your head out of your ass (I love that saying) and feel you can play well with others, send me a PM and I’ll think about removing the hold on your account.

What a stupid fucking argument.


Penis Enlargement Forum -- How To Jelq -- Free Penis Enlargement Videos

Make a Donation This place runs on donations, help out if you can. Thanks.

Spruce,

With respect to the forum rules, I would like to point out that none of my posts on this topic (3 including this one) have included profanity or engaged in name calling or insults. My strongest objection to circumcision is that it is done forcibly and without consent to infants. If someone prefers to be circumcised as a consenting adult, so be it. But, in most cases, there simply is no legal, moral or medical justification for surgical removal healthy, functioning body parts of infants. It is frustrating to read comments about circumcision of the prepuce from people who haven’t taken the time to learn about the tissue and it’s function.

I agree, name-calling and profanity is counter productive to any discussion.

bbprof61, you are absolutely correct, you did not use profanity and I apologize for grouping you in with johnny.

I’m going to go ahead an leave this thread since there is no end to this conversation, I guess that was my original point.


Spruce

Start Date Nov 05 2006: BPEL (5.50) NBPEL (5.0) E .Girth(4.75) F. Length(4.00) F. Girth(4.25)

Last Meas June 14 2007: BPEL (7) NBPEL (6) E .Girth(5.50) F. Length(4.125) F. Girth(4.50)

Originally Posted by Mule
From Foreskin Sexual Function/Circumcision Sexual Dysfunction

I can’t find any numbers but I recall a study claiming that a woman had a 68% higher chance on a orgasm if she had sex with an uncircumsised penis as opposed to a cut one. But I can’t say anything about how solid that study was. It still seems obvious that the foreskin has an effect on the pussy during fucking as it makes up about a quart to a third of a penis that is in the average range. Can’t expect that much loss off mass to go unnoticed.

Thanks, another argument in the battle for the foreskin. If I tell this to a few mothers, they may let their son choose himself.

I am uncut and have problems with foreskin all my life, no matter how hard I try to keep it clean. Bad smell, infections, oversensitivity to the point of being painful when touched…… I wish I were cut.

So what does sir prefer, cut or uncut? There’s no comparison when it comes to which is ‘better for sex’…depends whether you know how to use your tool for maximum effect! So whether you’re cut or uncut, makes no difference in the bedroom, it all comes down to technique - like most things…in here! ;)

- Lee Beast

I’ve been doing foreskin restoration. On my little sample of n=1, I can attest it is much better uncircumcised. This is the case because the extra shaft skin glides over my head during sex adding contrasting stimulation to just her vagina. In addition, the extra skin protects my head during the day. Believe me I’ve become more sensitive. The glans is no longer rough and hard but instead smooth, shiny and soft.

For her, the ridge of the glans (corona?) is no longer hard and scrapes much less. There is less discomfort after a longer session (she used to get irritated frequently after 30+). She has told me that it feels nicer. Not a mind blowing difference for her, but at least a small plus. It is more of a big difference for me.

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:41 PM.