Could this be a reason for stalled gains?

I read an article that suggests that penises are normally proportionate in length and girth. The attachment shows the “normal” proportions suggested. The article goes on to say that,

“The size of a penis' girth correlates with the length. 8.5 inch penises would normally have a girth of 6 inches. Some penises have a short length and a thick girth, or a long length and a thin girth. These penises are much more rarer than normal.”

So I became curious. There is the debate over length first, then girth. Also, some members say that they have stalled in one “direction”.

Could it be that the penis can’t “easily” be enlarged out of its proportion, such that for each increase in length, one should work on the correlating increase in girth?

Using my self as an example, I am inline with the table. 7” x 5.25”, then 7.5” x 5.5”, now that I’m pushing 8” in length, those gains may stall until I reach the corresponding 5.75” in girth. Also, can this formula then be applied to whatever measurements as long as the 1” x .5” ratio holds true.

If so, then you can use even smaller numbers and say that for every .5” gain in length, there should be a .25” gain in girth, and so on.

Thoughts?

I don’t think there is such a thing as normal proportion.

If you research in the forum you will see so many different stats with so many different gains.

I believe, and it’s my humble opinion, that the limit for a penis to grow is based on nerve endings. Some guys can increase a lot in length, others in girth, others both, others neither…

I have a thick penis and I cannot gain a single centimeter (less than 0.4 inch) because I was naturally born at the limit of the steel cord/ dorsal thickening… whatever. It feels that I have to put a hard work to overcome this, and I’m afraid of trying too hard and get my self a serious injury.

With that girth, if I have it proportional long, I would never here about thunders..