Originally Posted by snave72
I did a search but I didn’t see mention of this anywhere. I was curious if there is any correlation between PE gains on growers vs showers? I would think that growers have more natural elasticity but maybe have less room to grow per se. I’m a grower, I might be 1.5” flaccid but 5.5” erect. I definitely feel like PE would make a bigger difference in the flaccid size and I’d be happy with an extra inch on the erect size.
This is just a hypothesis of mine, but I think that growers have more elastin per volume or a better arrangement of elastin. I’ve noticed growers tend to have harder erections and I’ve also noticed from PE experience that it can turn you from a grower to a shower. I suspect that the transformation from grower to shower has something to do with the plateau for penis growth, like the deposition of collagen or fibrin, or unusual crosslinking of elastin and collagen, causing the tunica to be unable to crimp when flaccid.
One of the things I noticed from testing antifibrotics is that I went from being a major shower to a grower. My flaccid size became smaller without changing my erect size, so I’m inclined to think becoming a shower is due to the thickness of the collagen layer of the penis fascia. So far I haven’t found antifibrotics or method of using them to be useful for enlarging the penis. It doesn’t seem to have any impact on the growth rate that I noticed. One of the limitations, definitely not the only one, of my testing is I don’t have the time to test everything thoroughly. Unless I have a negative reaction, I try things for about 2 weeks. Some things I’ve tested for longer because I had a lot of reason to think they could work, but I haven’t found any chem PE treatment that increases the growth rate so far.
Starting: 7"bplx5.2" 2017 (shrunk from disuse)(originally 8"bplx4.5", gained to 9"bplx6")
Current: 9.0"bplx6.125" 2020
Goal: 11.5"bplx7" 2021.