Increasing Cross-Sectional Area

Hi all, I read an interesting Post a while back - I can post a link to it where the discussion was regarding increasing area in relation to girth. If anyone knows where this post is and wants to link it, that would be great.

Anyway the author more or less mentioned that the shape of the cross-section of penis matters greatly when looking at penis girth.

Example: If one has a square penis that is 1.5”, that means their girth - essentially the perimeter will be 6”.

Where as a true circle would be 4.7 with a 1.5” Diameter.

I’ve read alot of posts discussing the Penis as Ellipse or Circle which is usually false, It’s somewhere between an actual rectangle and a true ellipse for many - Thus meaning that a standard PI formula would never work, nor would the calculation for an ellipse or circle which makes the whole attempt at this pointless.

It is actually very possible that you could have a north-south cross section and diameter of 1.5” and have significantly more than a 4.7” girth since the shape for many of us is a very complex hybrid of a ellipse, rectangle, triangle and is not a smooth surface

That said, Are there specific exercises that target more round or circular growth for future gains as this would increase efficiency/area? A bit of an obscure question, but thought I’d throw it out there!

Thanks!

Yeah, a 3x5 index card has a length of 5 and girth of 6 and a volume of nearly 0. :chuckle:

An elliptical penis shape is probably a lot more accurate than triangular or rectangular.

Swaffel actually measured his real volume by water displacement and found that it was significantly less than what the standard cylinder calculation gave. Something like 25 ci real volume vs. 40 ci perfect cylinder calculation, but I’m fuzzy on the exact numbers. So when we compare ourselves to beverage sizes, we may have to knock off about 40% if we’re being honest with ourselves.

The CC’s are naturally bigger than the CS in most guys, so I’d venture anything that targets the CS would be the way to go for a more circular shape.

Agreed - An elliptical shape is generally much more accurate, It Just can’t be used to calculate area and in some cases it’s not even that close. A guy could have say a 1.6” Diameter and 1.4” depth and still have 5.5” girth if his penis had a very shallow curve and parts that are nearly flat or someone could have 2” wide dick with a 1.5” depth which would be very large in Diameter and only have the same size if it were almost a perfect elliptical. However the area would be so much more. Point being that I am starting to think even measuring girth is kind of pointless compared to a volume test.

For instance certain parts of my dick are pretty shallow, and my girth would be more than my depth and diameter would indicate, but not more volume than someone super circular.