Originally Posted by bhcentral
My issue with this statement is this site pushes people to a newbie routine that is manual…..
I agree with you that manual stretching can apply way more force than hanging; I believe this is a serious disadvantage of manual stretching. I think it should be explained better in the newbie routine the correct way to stretch avoiding precocious toughening.
As for the rest, there are a few things to consider. First, when I signed on TP there was kinda a consensus that hanging was the ‘ultimate length technique’; this consensus was due to two things mostly: 1) hanging hits our imagination at a primordial level : how couldn’t hanging a weight from your penis bring gains? 2) Biggest gainers (according to theirs own tales and nothing else though) in both length and girth were hangers.
But when you consider the naive thought (no offense intended, I hung too) sub 1) at the light of the few real things we know, the fashination subsides a lot (for me at least):
a) major hanging ‘promoters’ are not reliable IMHO; not credible gains through not credible routines, no pics etc.;
b) hanging theory is ludicrous; no other PEers have been filled with so many wrong ideas, like ‘inner penis shifting out’, ‘healing shorter when recovering’, LOT theory, scars in the penis and what not; and the fact that some of hangers report in a way or another that those ideas are consistent with theirs experience just means that listening these people is nothing but a waste of time, probably some of them never did any PE and are just posting imaginary things for a reason or another.
c) look at this poll results:
For those who tried both: what gave you best gains, hanging or stretching?
I think it doesn’t accord with your opinion that manual is high rated just because ‘newbie gains’; and remember that most of votes were given in the poll when no one could argue that hanging wasn’t the best of the best without being attacked in a pretty harsh way (which happened many times to me also, even by other mods).