In general age limits are set to protect minors. It is unfortunate that no matter what the topic, thundersplace, drinking, shooting, that society cannot make a case by case decision. I have met some teenagers that were very responsible, and on the flip side I have met ‘adults’ who I wouldn’t trust to cross the street alone. However since we as a society cannot make a case by case decision in each matter for each person, all we can do is select an age that is generally acceptable.
Quote
These limitations are often based on at which age people generally are responsiple enough to be granted that right.
Hobby, it is interesting that you focused on the word granted, my minds eye gravitated to the word responsible, because of the aforementioned cases in which some minors are more responsible than their adult counterparts.
Quote
Rights are not given, granted, nor subject to any government’s whims. They exist permanently and in perpetuity for all individuals. Those in charge at any given time may not recognize them, but the failure of the king to recognize one’s rights doesn’t negate their existence.
In a perfect world or nirvana or stranded on a desert island maybe but the reality of the here and now is that no one has complete and unfettered freedom. People are either controlled by social norms or governed by norms that society has deemed important enough to codify as law.
Hobby, lets take for example several of the actions referred to in this post already: membership at thunders, drinking alcohol, driving a car and shooting a pistol. Do all people, regardless of age, have the right permanently to engage in any of these whenever they want? However they want? I would ask you, when you drive do you stop at stop signs? Do you follow the speed limit? If so howcome?
For extra credit: Can anyone name at least one place in the United States that it is legal for 18 year olds to drink???
Nem