Width vs Girth

Is girth the wrong lateral measurement to shoot for when individuals have a downward curve or under-developed CS?

The widely accepted measurement of girth works under the assumption that the penis is shaped like a cylinder, and online tools such as The Visualizer seem to model the penis as such. However, I would argue that any increases in girth resulting from growth in the CS are “wasted” gains since they don’t directly contribute to an increase in female pleasure during standard P in V sex. If you consider that the width of a penis is what pushes on the walls of the vagina to create that stretching feeling and that vaginas are much longer vertically than they are wide, width is what should be pushed for more specifically than girth.

My main reason for going down this thought track is because I have a downward curve which limits the ability of my CS to expand. I would almost consider my CS “under-developed” compared to individuals who I see with an upward curve that generally have a very large and pronounced CS. I’ve engaged in exercises that target the CS such as Angion but the issue doesn’t seem to be EQ related as much as structural to my member. My girth measurements are slightly above average, however I have a larger width than my girth would give me credit for. I can easily pack the walls of a 1.75” pump tube, which means that using 2πr my girth “should” be closer to 5.5”. So my CS is basically robbing me of almost a quarter of an inch of girth.

Has anybody else come across this issue, and should we be trying to focus on increasing width more than universally increasing girth?

I think I understand your point, although I don’t necessarily agree with it. While the labia is certainly taller/longer than wide, the vagina introitus (opening) is much less so and is characterized in medical literature as pear shaped. As long as the penis is larger than the vaginal opening, it will stretch to accomodate the penis and make full contact with the penis.

I’ll agree that there will be some cases of extreme difference in vaginal size and penis size that there may not be full 360° contact but this is likely to be rare.

I have the same mindset as you zeitghost, I 100% believe that width contributes to female pleasure more than depth and I have also struggled to gain girth in my CS. Although I haven’t measured yet it looks like all the girth I have gained has been in my CCs, widthwise and depthwise. I have also tried the angion but like you found it only increases eq.

Considering your belief, why are you so eager to gain in your CS?

I also believe width is more beneficial…

I read something very interesting on one of the Ultrasound forums, possibly by Igigi. The idea behind Ultrasound heating is that it allows the Septum, the “steel cord” of the Tunica between the chambers to lengthen. The Septum is a big limiting factor for many. It was noted, that when his Septum stretched, he noticed his CS become much fuller as if the Septum was restricting it from properly filling before.

Not for my wife it would seem. When I started PE about a month ago my girth seemed to be progressing quicker than my length and when I informed my other half she looked really disappointed and said that she preferred length and can’t take much girth. She is tight though, to be fair. Aparently her ex hubby has a 9x5, so maybe he carved out the shape of her crevice and the size is now set🐍😄

By the way, speaking of girth, if anyone says you are hung like a tin of tuna it could mean your pecker is only 1.38 inches in length but 10.6 girth! Now, that would be a sight to behold.

Cross-sectionally (IDK if that’s even a word) the penis is more or less triangular, with the CC making up the entirety of the base and substantially determining the height of an equilateral triangle.

Yes, of course, overall width is relevant to the size discussion and is probably even worth tracking if girth gains are part of the goal. The problem is likely that most guys don’t have a set of dial calipers, whereas darn near everybody has a ruler and some string. There’s also the issue of measurement angle; it’s a fussy thing to get an accurate diameter measurement on an elliptical object.

Whatever metric you use is fine, as long as you have a consistent metrology so you get accurate results.

Interesting discussion. I also have an underdeveloped CS and a downward curve.

Here is an encouraging post by “Thick Cock” who said his CS grew significantly as a result of PE:
Thick Cock - Girth theory: glans and corpus cavernosum.

I guess it is possible to undo a curve.

My wife is somewhat unusual as she says she prefers length to girth, but her vagina is tight. I think an 8x6 would be the perfect fit for her when she’s loosened up to the max.