Anyone has statistic about cut vs uncut?

Have been joining this great forum for a while, and found that uncut guys (like me) seem have more problems than cut ones, such as stretching, hanging/wrapping problems, even in advertising some devices, it has to mention something like “SUITABLE FOR UNCUT”, and many more.

I am thinking whether those cuts has a better chance to gain compare to uncuts, in term of time and result.

I got the statistic like Girth Gain vs Time, Length Gain vs Time and few others in this forum, and that motivates me a lot, so if there is any statistic about uncut vs cut, it might motivate us (the uncuts) someway.

Am just curious.

I would think that genetics and consistency would pay a far larger part in gains, than being cut or uncut would.

Being uncut does make hanging and some ADS more awkward to apply correctly, but that little extra effort shouldn’t affect gains negatively in my opinion.

For the record, I’m uncut and I gained 0.75” EL x 0.25” EG in my first 5 months. Since then however, I’ce had a long break from PE, and am only recently restarting.

All you really need to know is that uncut guys gain. Period. That alone should keep you motivated.

The main differences between being cut and uncut for PE is that someone who’s cut doesn’t have to worry about gaining foreskin and is not as sensitive around the glans. Hence someone who’s uncut has to make sure he does the exercises correctly in order to not gain too much extra foreskin and be more careful because of a higher sensitivity. There’s no difference gainwise.

There is one advantage of being uncut you will save a lot of money on lubricants :)

I’ve noticed my foreskin stretching with my exercises and permanently “lengthen”. Piet, is there anyway to limit that ?

Avoid tension on your skin while doing exercises as much as possible. This can be tough if you’re cut. I noticed a significant decrease in foreskin after having gained girth.