BP vs. NBP, yet again

I know this topic has been brought up at least a dozen times before. Let me try to ask a slightly different question on it. Between these two methods, rather than ask which is the better standard of measurment, let me ask which is the better measure of ‘big’?

Due to an infection, I’ve got a little fluid retention right now which decends to my public area. As a result of this, my NBPEL was about 1/2” shorter than usual. Under normal circumstances, my NBPEL is 7” with my bodyfat % being at 8%. Still, when I went to measure by my BPEL (just to make sure there had been no losses), I was my usual 7 7/8”. So, in theory, I could have my fat pad liposuctioned and be nearly a full 8” NBPEL.

It just seems to beg the question. Any thoughts?

I think its a worn out question…. If you measure along the bottom of the shaft that number will be bigger than NBPEL and if you are going deep inside her —- depending on angle you can get the entire bottom of your shaft in. The best measure of ‘big’ as you put it is obviously the biggest number…

Bottom line is the only measurement that really matters is the standard measurement by which you can compare with others. Its all relative.

So, there is no standard. You are right, though. It’s a worn out question.

I don’t use a BPEL anymore because I lose the erection to fast. I only use NBP for the last few years.

I “hate” you. 7 inch nbpel and I would be a very happen man. Well with 6 inch girth too.

I hate myself for not being more.

If that’s you in the avatar, you got a pretty good build (no, not gay). Do you compete in bodybuilding? I’ve done a couple shows in my time.

THIS has been mentioned before as well. I think many of those with a small fat pad, (1/2” or less), like to measure NBPEL vs BPEL. The larger the fat pad, the more one will want to measure BPEL.

However, as has been discussed ad nauseam; the cock size is the SAME, no matter the size of the fat pad, and the “usable” dick is more about angles and positions than anything else.

In other words, it DOES NOT MATTER. Bone pressed is the ONLY way to get a consistent gauge of size.

This post should be copied and pasted whenever the topic comes up. Die topic, die!

Hey guys in my humble opinion unless you have virtually no fat pad at all the bone pressed measurement is the best way to measure for progress.
The non bonepressed measurement is more for bragging rights and is the actual length that will be used for sex.
I don’t think that bonepressed measurements should be used for the general public that doesn’t know about PE. An example is say you tell a girl that you have an 8 inch dick but you are over weight and 2 inches of it is buried in your fatpad. To the girl your bonepressed 8 inch dick will only look and feel like 6 inches. She won’t know what bonepressed means. She will only go by what she sees which will appear to her as 6 inches if her judgement of what 6 inches looks like is accurate.

So to sum it up use bonepressed meaurements for your own personal progress since it is more accurate in checking for length increases and use non bonepressed measurements for the general public.

Lmao nice one Long.

—101

Bone pressed for accurate PE measurement tracking is the only consistent way to go. As far as arguing that only NBPEL can penetrate will be based on many contributing factors in you AND her.

The difference between my BPEL and NBPEL is half an inch, but by visually watching penetration in several positions I can see I can push about half of that half of inch in. So with a 6.25 NBPEL measurement I still have 6.50 I can penetrate with.

This is going to be different for every individual out there.

I think your statement here, Saiyan, is what’s really at the core of this kind of thread. As one of “those” with a large fat pad, I can tell you with absolute certainty, that my SO gets at least 95% of my BPEL. Guys who show more, via NBPEL, seem to imply that they are working with better, bigger goods than those with large fat pads. (whether they are skinny or fat…… heredity has a lot to do with it,…. it true)

I’ll add to the “nauseam” here; the fat pad COMPRESSES during sex. I am not willing to go further with how, why, percentages, etc anymore. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. ;)

Freder23 said the truth, below:

[Quote]

“If you measure along the bottom of the shaft that number will be bigger than NBPEL and if you are going deep inside her —- depending on angle you can get the entire bottom of your shaft in.”

[Quote]

Fat pads do compress with full penetration. They don’t compress down to nothing, but they do compress down. Now in my opinion, having large thighs or other fat body parts around the waist could make it tough to penetrate deeply. One woman that I was with had a thick booty, and it did prevent me from going as deep as I’ve been able to in average women.

Now, girls do look at a cock and judge it as eye candy by the NBPEL. Some of them know that fat pads compress.

How much of our BPEL can we get into a vagina? That is a very good question. In one MRI study, the pubic bones came within 4cm of eachother at the closest. I feel like it is safe to estimate that 2” of my BPEL is lost between my pubic bone, and the remnants of her hymen. I maintain about 13% bodyfat, and have a .625” fat pad on average.

Yup, he pretty much killed the topic right there. RIP BP vs NBP topic!

Well.My dick is far bigger measured on the outer curve, the inner curve naturally measures shorter and I’m not measuring past the balls on the outer, but to the same point. Given this, I consider the bone pressed my real length, it’s still shorter than the outer curve virtually all of which depending on the angle can be penetrated in.

Generally if you have a big fat pad you shouldn’t go telling people your dick is bigger than the NBPEL