common length and girth combination?

Wasn’t sure how to title it correctly. . My question being when measuring a random 100 men and statiscially speaking 1 person being 8 inches in length and 1 person being 6 inches in girth does that mean a true 8x6 inch penis is 1 out of 10,000 or is someone with an 8 incher more likely to have 6 inch girth?

I read at the true average thread that statistics wise 8inches is 1 out of 1, 000 meaninmeaning that a true 8x6 could possibly be one out of one million. I guess that’s way off but just trying to see how rare 8x6 is or if larger length and girth usually comes together

I’m going to guess that there is no study showing girth and length together, and that the true averages thread came up with that number by combining the rarity of each by thereself. That being said, I bet that the chance of a 8” non bone pressed by 6” minimum shaft girth is a lot closer to the one on a million figure than the one in ten thousand.

useful resource :

http://howlongismyschlong.com/

F

Uncas,

This has to do with normal stats and correlation between 2 random variables. The correlation coefficient drives the likelihood the two variables will behave accordingly.

Very few studies made this calculation:
- http://www.natu re.com/ijir/jou … l/3901569a.html
The coefficient is 0.46 between erect length and erect circumference.
- http://onlineli brary.wiley.com … .12894/abstract
The coefficient is 0.46 between suprapubic erect length and erect girth, and 0.55 between bone to tip erect length and erect girth.
Details here: (slightly different results due to corrections before official edition)

To summarize, longer penises tend to be girthier, but only with a correlation of 0.5 (0 means none and random variables are totally independent, 1 means they are fully correlated and variables behave in the same way).

Glad you found a study that also had reference to nbp and bp measurements. To many times we are wondering which one they are using. Love the fact that they used both.

Am I wrong in my understanding that in the largest NPB was 18cm and BP was 20 cm? Considering the amount of people claiming a 9+” penis on the Internet, it always amazes me that none show up to these studies.

Sorry original poster. Was not my intention to derail this thread. Was just impressed with staline’s links.