Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Concept: Growth Ratio?

12

Originally Posted by Chairs Missing
Hey Horsehung what is your routine like? If you don’t mind me asking.

HH is no longer with us. He attracted a lot of attention and posted claims of big gains to I think an 11” length.

He then posted some less than convincing pics, and continually promised more which never appeared. Eventually he became an ex member.


Feb 2004 BPEL 6.7" NBPEL ???? BPFSL ???? EG 5.65" Feb 2005 BPEL 7.1" NBPEL 5.8" BPFSL 6.9" EG 5.8" Feb 2006 BPEL 7.3" NBPEL 5.8" BPFSL 7.6" EG 5.85" Feb 2007 BPEL 7.3" NBPEL 5.8" BPFSL 7.5" EG 5.9"

Excellent post and bump Electron.

My total size goals are +2.5” BPEL x +1.0” EG, a ratio of 2.5.

I’m currently at +1.75” BPEL x +0.688” EG, a ratio of 2.54.

So far so good :)


originally: 6.5" BPEL x 5.0" EG (ms); currently: 9.825" BPEL x 6.825" EG (ms)

Hidden details: Finding xeno: a penis tale; Some photos: Tiger

Tell me, o monks; what cannot be achieved through efforts. - Siddhartha Gautama

Originally Posted by i_want_8_inches

At my last measurement, I had a gain ratio of 2.75:1 (bpel:eg). But part of the bpel gains were from loss of fat pad.

What did you do to lose the fat pad?

Originally Posted by Mr. Fantastic
Here are some figures re. clamping and the length to girth ratio (not including joe_smith’s since he’s only just started collecting data).

The examples from the patent have the following ratios (maths isn’t my Strong suite, so if you can correct me please do).

The first subject detailed in the application had a length to girth ratio gain of almost 3:2

Two other subjects form the patent examples had length to girth gain ratios of 1:1

aristocane reported a length to girth gain ratio of 2:3

Therefore it’s entirely possible that when it comes to clamping there might exist a girth to length gain ratio of 1:1

Mr. Fantastic - Patent Pending Chemical PE

Even though I’m quoting the above, I don’t have much faith in clamping for length gains. I’ve gone back to hanging to reach my length goal.

Another interesting concept: ‘Maximum Rate of Gain’

Originally Posted by Mr. Fantastic
…my advice would be not to try to hang too heavy too soon, since you probably really don’t need to as long as you increase the weight a little at a time so as to maintain your ‘maximum rate of gain’

I’d estimate the basic maximum rate of gain to be about 1.5eighths of an inch per month— I really don’t think it’s possible to gain at a faster rate than this.

My personal maximum rate of gain is 1eighth of an inch per month (about 1mm a week).

If you can match those ‘maximum rate of gain’ figures at a lower weight, there’s really no point in trying to hang heavier— you’d just be causing yourself more problems, including inhibited gains (there’s an argument that suggests that hanging very heavy weights can cause the collagen in the structure to knit in a way that can stop growth entirely. Collagen can knit in a certain way that it becomes as strong as tensile steel (run a search on xenolith’s threads for more information on collagen and gains)).

Mr. Fantastic - Intense Hanging

Originally Posted by LoveMachine
This seems to be a common rate of gain for many hangers around here (1mm per week and the 1/8” per month). So your probaly right in concluding the basic maximum gain rates for hangers (clamp/vise style, don’t have enough info on vacuum hanging yet) people would be those rates. :)

LoveMachine - Intense Hanging

Originally Posted by Mr. Fantastic
Bud_do reported a 1.5eighths of an inch gain rate, but that was hanging much much heavier weights than I personally could possibly handle.

I think a realistic average would be the 1/8” (1mm per week).

Mr. Fantastic - Intense Hanging

You gained 3.5”.

0.92:1 Details in sig and link below.


Started: 2/03, Finished: 5/06, Total Gains: 1.375” BPEL 1.5” EG, Details: Progress after a year or longer off?

Only those who attempt the absurd will achieve the impossible—M. C. Escher

As far as you question goes, and I’m not sure if someone mentioned this, but using a ratio for growth is a really bad idea.

You could gain .00001” in length but only .0000001” girth.

That would be a 100:1 ratio of length. Damn, your making great gains son!!

A better way to word it, besides ratios, is the actual length:actual girth, if your picking up what I’m putting down.

Many applied-sciences and commercial endeavors make effective use of ratio analysis. Provided one understands its limitations, it is not, in and of itself, “a really bad idea”.


Started: 2/03, Finished: 5/06, Total Gains: 1.375” BPEL 1.5” EG, Details: Progress after a year or longer off?

Only those who attempt the absurd will achieve the impossible—M. C. Escher

I’m making a reply to subscribe to this thread to see how others have done on this. I have nothing real to report being a newbie myself.

I need 7x7 though. Actually, she needs 7x7 and I want to provide that without assistance from toys. I don’t know if it’s possible, but I’m going to do my very best to get there.

Top
12

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:33 PM.