Originally Posted by Mad Hatter
Mr. Fantastic:
Ha! This is just what I’ve been waiting to see. Someone who doesn’t even jelq and is getting gains from just hanging! Perfect […] Just what I needed to see; that it’s possible to gain with no focus on girth work at all. And you even improved girth from hanging alone. This makes my day
Absolutely— I jelqed a little during my first year of PE but apart from that I’ve done no other girth-work (apart from clamping for about seven sets over the last week to see what it was like)
Also— I’ve always had a natural baseball-bat but now my base-girth is the wides part of my shaft and I’m sure that’s definitely from the hanging (hanging is notable both for length gains and for adding base girth)
I’ve used a Penimaster extensively also, and it has, without a doubt, added to my girth gains.
Originally Posted by Mad Hatter
If you don’t mind the off-topic question, how long have you been doing 500 minute long hanging sessions? All year since you started? Or did you just recently move up to that?
I don’t record total time spent hanging (maybe you have me confused with another member), I just try to get as close as I possibly can to consistent twenty-minute sets at ten-minute intervals across the whole day. I’ve habitualised the processes involved so that it’s as easy as it can be, and I’m not strict with myself as to exact timing as that’d make it too much of a drag and I’d stop (it’s uncomfortable enough hanging all day as it is (but don’t get me wrong I love the gains :hearton: ))
I hung quite a lot during the first year of PE although not consistently because I’ve had a lot of trouble with my hanger— basically I broke it, so it’s interrupted my hanging (I think most of my newbie gains came from the Penimaster and pulling jelq-squeezes towards the floor with a Power-jelq (I skipped the newbie routine in favour of a Penimaster and a Power-jelq :rolleyes: )
Simultaneous Length & Girth Work
Originally Posted by Mad Hatter
I’ve seen all the evidence I need. In PE, if you stop and think, you’re doing something wrong. Clamp, hang, whatever. All it wants is to feel the burn. Thank you class you are excused, please pick up your diplomas on your way out of the lecture hall.
I’m not sure that it’s that straight-forward (: —but it’s true that no one ever gained by just thinking about PE.
Originally Posted by d_sut
I want to clamp also, I love the thick feeling when the girth has had a hit.Will it stop length gains also? I have a theory this is just that, a theory and clamping might kick-start everything else! But that is probably just a half-baked theory from myself.
Who knows? Maybe clamping is like a mini shock-routine.
As for girth-gains inhibiting length-gains, I think there may be some truth to it, but the key question is ‘how much truth?’ (i.e. how much is extra girth going to affect the speed of your length-gains?)…
…this question relates - I think - to the question of how much weight a hanger has to hang to see results:
The long term PEers (the PE vets) have to hang heavier and heavier weights to see ongoing results ((unless they take regular deconditioning breaks)). This is, theoretically, attributable to at least two factors:
1. The more length and girth you gain the more mass there is through which to distribute the forces (weight/traction/pressure etc.) Plus, the mass itself may become more dense —meaning even more force may be required.
2. The more intense your routine the tougher the collagen gets (i.e. at higher intensities it meshes in a way intended to protect the tissues from a ‘perceived’ acute-injury/emergency/threat etc. thereby creating a vicious-circle for length-gains ((the answer being a deconditioning break etc.))
So I’m guessing the question of the extent to which girth will effect length-gains depend on (at least) two factors:
A. The size & density of the combined mass of tissues to which you’re applying the force (The larger the area/mass/density of the tissue to be ‘treated’ then the more intense (heavier/stronger) the forces applied to it have to be)
B. The constitution of the collagen created in response to the ‘micro-injuries’ caused by the application of the forces (weight/traction/pressure etc.), which will be more-or-less dependent on the types of exercises utilised and the intensity at which they’re applied.
The guys who build their routines on the theories behind deconditioning breaks work on both girth and length simultaneously and still make good gains in both areas.
Originally Posted by Mad Hatter
Hanging stretches everything (as seemingly evidenced by Mr. F’s gains of both length and girth with primarily just hanging),
At the moment I’m restricting my PE to hanging and ADS but I have used a Power-jelq in the past, focusing its usage on jelq-squeezes at 50% erection level & stretching towards the floor (for length).
Originally Posted by Mad Hatter
but we know it emphasizes Tunica and Lig work over Corpus Cavernosum stretching. So, perhaps, adding the right balance of extra girth work from clamping or jelqing to your hang time may move you closer to your ideal gain rate.
I think this is a great question with regards improving gain-rates. If this were true and we could work out an ideal balance between length-work & girth-work we could increase the speed of both girth-gains & length-gains considerably.
Originally Posted by Mad Hatter
It’s theorized that too much strain on one (Tunica/Ligs or Corpus Cavernosum) without enough backing up from the other means the faster one has to heal over itself while waiting for the other to catch up. Or that’s what I got out of it anyway.
Can you post the link to that thread? —it sounds interesting, although I’d be inclined to believe that everything gets worked at once, after all they’re all parts of the same structure— even though, I’d like to see the thread and hear the theories. If it turns out to be true there may be much faster gains to be made.
Originally Posted by Mad Hatter
Well, I do recall reading some research from one of the more science-minded members of this forum (whoever’s the one that has the anime avatar character that looks like Washu…).His theory (which I may not be summarizing correctly) was that, with every temporary Tunica gain you get from pretty much all these exercises, your Corpus Cavernosum needs enough attention given to it so that it can catch up to each microgain you get from a length session.
It’s an interesting theory— if correct it would mean that we should all be doing at least a little girth-work in order to increase our length-gains.
I’d like to hear more about this. I’d be curious to find out how he came to those conclusions— do you have the link?
Can I really increase the speed of my length-gains by adding girth-work to my routine?
I’d be reluctant to take time away from length-work to give to girth-work to try and prove the theory, because that might have a two-fold negative affect on my length-gains (i.e. less time spent working for length and more mass to contend with as a result —that might very well be a double whammy for my length gain-rate).
Would it be true to say that adding girth-work to a length routine might increase length-gains just enough to neutralise the effect of re-distributing the time originally spent on length-work?
If so, that would mean that if we found the correct balance we could maintain the rate of our length-gains but gain bonus girth along the way, at least in the short term (any increase in mass - in theory - is eventually going to slow gains (in accordance with hypothesis number 2 above))
Of course this is all conjecture, but interesting nonetheless. I for one would love to have the answers to the above.