Exposing More Inner Penis

This is just a thought and theory that came to me this morning. When I was feeling out my member as it was hard, I know it goes a long way into the body. I know the general thought (usually Bib) is that hanging brings out or releases the inner penis, as well as stretching the tunica.

This morning I decided to start gently pulling the skin where the shaft and scrotum meet - one hand up, one hand down, mostly down in the thought/hope of exposing more of that inner penis. Any thoughts on this?

My first thought is that I’m really not growing my penis, but I AM exposing more of it. So my quest to have my junk touch my navel won’t be realized this way. But to expose more of that penis would certainly give that illusion that I have actually gained, at least until I do a BPEL measurement. I don’t know - just tossing this idea out there and welcome any thoughts.

Would only cause loose skin, there’s nothing like inner penis that theory is bullshit.

What happened with Bib is penile hypertrophy. Damaged cells get bigger and stronger.

I’ve always felt the inner penis theory was BS as well, though I believe there is legitimacy to stretching the ligs, allowing a little more “inner penis” to be released.

So you believe Bib was all tunica gains?

The inner penis theory is that you do low hanging angles and through that you target the ligaments, as the ligaments are being stretched and damaged they let go more of the inner penis (the penis that stays behind the pelvic limit). I do believe that it will increase BPEL and BPFSL if you can properly do it or can reach a state of good fatigue and ride it. I believe that if you stretch the base of the penis you will stretch mostly skin.

All of my gains came about from hanging at lower angles. Still not sure of the science behind it, though I am positive my ligaments were stretched due to how my unit now hangs down. I’m sure I had some good tunica stretch as well and gained from that.

Yes even cutting the ligaments won’t change the BPEL of an erect CC
But would improve flaccid hang. You can look at the anatomy and draw what it would look like with no ligs. At a 90 degree angle the length doesn’t change

All the ligs do affect the angle the phallus exits the body. A lower angle makes an illusion of being longer, but when at a 90 degree angle the length is unchanged.

Bib gained 4 inches by hypertrophy cells

One hand at the base yes, however if you get a light erection and perform a stretch around the head, pulling at the base will be possible with the other hand as it will push some blood upwards that will be stuck in between both hands. Then the base-hand won’t slip and pull the skin only. It’s a powerful stretch. The palm of the head-hand must face the floor otherwise it won’t trap enough blood.

If ligaments and low angle like BTC and SD hanging don’t give gains, then why there are lots of guys on Bib’s forum reporting gains solely doing BTC angle?

What do you mean by hypertrophy cells?

They give gains but not by stretching ligs bullshit. By damaging the cells in which they become bigger and stronger which is hypertrophy.

Do you think the BPEL would change if they cut this lig, draw it out yourself on paper. Look at before and after lig lenghthning surgeries. lengthening Lig theory doesn’t make sense. Lot is also bullshit.

Look at any lig lengthening surgery erect, the premise is that a lower hanging erection would look bigger while true, the BPEL remains the same you measure at a 90 degree angle.

This all makes sense now, after getting into bodybuilding for several years and learning the science behind things. I read an article about the guy with the biggest penis in the world and due to the amount of scar tissue in his unit, they cannot declare him natural and therefore he doesn’t hold the title.

What was the name of the guy in the magazine article?

I just replied to another post regarding a similar matter — there is ligamentolysis which is the severing of the suspensory ligaments altogether to max out yields of this "inner penis" through a prescribed traction/hanging/extension routine; apparently flaccid length sees immediate improvement whereas erect gains are seemingly hit or miss (how much of this has to do with the Surgeon’s technique, the patient’s unique anatomy, and the patient’s commitment to the post-op instructions is hard to say in its role with respect to erect gains).

Fortunately a few ligament procedures have been performed in the past few months on the PhalloBoards 3.0 Progress Report Section, so hopefully those results may better establish how much of a role the ligaments play in overall length gains.

It appears some of these Surgeons believe in this "inner penis," but all acknowledge (just like our starting endowments), how much is available varies person to person (kind of like whatever you get from low-angle stretches of your ligs may very well be the best you’re going to get).

All one has to do is follow their erect shaft all the way and you can feel the inner penis.

As for the lig cutting, I question whether that really does much to help length.