Originally Posted by suziesun12
Also, Pudendum, RBC’s do not have a lifespan of 30 days. I’m not sure where you got that information from. Most literature suggests an average lifespan of 120 days.
Suziesun12-I was imprecise in my statement. Classic studies (from the 1940’s) pinned the of red blood cell life span at 120 days. The methods by which the lifespan of red blood cells are measured differ greatly (and I will not elaborate); the most medically accepted measurement today yields a a half-life of 30 days, that means 1/2 of say 100 cells remain at 30 days and 1/4 remain at 60 days, etc. Please beg my pardon my use of the term lifespan incorrectly here. The life span of packed red blood cells for transfusion is 30 days (this is how I confused myself). By the way if you’re interested the reference for this, it is in William’s Hematology Chapter 31. Destruction of Erythrocytes, McGraw Hill Co., 2007.
Even if you take your 120 day life span, it is a testament to the resilience of a blood cells ability to bend to get through the smallest of blood vessels, the capillaries. The cell membrane of the red cell actually “tank treads” over its internal contents, accounting for much of it’s sturdiness.
Originally Posted by suziesun12
The human body is an amazing thing and is designed to take damage and shed and recycle pieces as they are damaged. Problems start to arise, however, when the rate of death/damage exceeds the rate of neogenesis. This applies to any tissue, whether be bone in the case of osteoporosis or RBC’s with anemia.
In this statement you have defined disease. When the body can’t maintain its normal state (it’s homeostasis if you will), disease results. So if 99% of guys (I’ll go further on to say 99.9%) have no problem because they’re normal, why do you continue to argue with all of us. Ok, I’ll grant you that I wouldn’t recommend jelqing to a guy who has a disease process that causes red blood cells to break up. Why are you getting worked up about maybe 0.1% of guys who might be affected (and more than likely already know that there are things they can’t do because of their fragile or defective red blood cells or defects in organs of their body that might damage them).
Originally Posted by suziesun12
This unverified, potential effect of significant RBC damage certainly would not apply to 99% of PE’ers, but those people using enough force to cause thrombosis, edema, and splinter hemorrhages (and those are reported injuries on this site) on a regular basis could be doing more than just damage to there penis. Again, anemia is generally asymptomatic and quickly reversible by stopping the over exercising.
You state this red blood cell destruction you are proposing is unverified (and I will promise you unverifiable). And it won’t be because you will not be able to measure enough of a difference to account for the normal variability you find in any lab exam performed (this is why you can get 3 different values for the same sample if you run the test 3 times). You won’t find any researcher to study it. Heck, we can’t even get the medical profession to do studies to verify the successes with PE that we all know exist. It’s just not going to happen because the incidence of problems (which is what the medical profession is based on) is so low as to be nonexistent.
As stated many times in this forum, penis vein thrombosis is over “diagnosed” by many penis owners. If you can strip a vein of its blood, it’s not thrombosed. And by the way, what has thromobosis got to do with blood cell destruction anyway. One does not begat the other; different mechanism: clotting is different than destruction.
Edema formation is the result of a totally different physiological mechanism than for red blood cell destruction. Again unrelated.
Splinter hemorrhages are long skinny splinter looking clots found under fingernails and are the result of trauma to the nail or from an infection of the heart. Since true infections of the heart are probably more uncommon than the hemolysis of red blood cells you propose, this is probably not the reason for the splinter hemorrhages reported. Damage to the nail bed does not presuppose similar damage in the penis by jelqers. Oh, and by the way, bleeding under the fingernail is not an indicator of blood cell breakdown, it’s an indicator of bleeding under the fingernail. It’s that simple.
Originally Posted by suziesun12
I might add that the penis is significantly more vascular than the foot.
Do you seriously believe this?? The penis has arteries, capillaries and veins to the skin and connective tissue structures to keep them happy and alive. The cavernosa and spongiosum are literally dilated veins forming lakes known as sinusoids. The penis is designed to engorge and live in a limited oxygen environment for extended periods (remember anything longer than 4 hours is priapism; that’s the extent to which the tunica can hold out without more oxygen). I guess you haven’t taken a look at the vascular supply to any muscles or even bones lately, particularly in the foot. Why do you suppose that the foot is feed by three very large arterial trunks. It’s not for looks. The foot is a highly vascular structure that makes the penis circulation look wimpy.
Originally Posted by mgus
march hematuria is something a hell of a lot more strenous than overworking one’s dick by PE. Forget it, by the time you’ve caused yourself anemia by PE, the anemia will be the least of your problems. I don’t believe anybody can get anywhere close.
Amen!!