How big is well- endowed....

I found out about dick size sub reddits yesterday. Basically love life discussions relating to size from non-PE guys who have posted their measurements along with their stories. It was very motivating to read the stories from the naturally big guys. Female reactions to big dicks are a real thing that I’ve never experienced. Some threshold around 14 cubic inches roughly, and some of them start to go ga ga for it, and it just gets more and more common the more volume beyond that.

It also put natural size into perspective. At Thunder’s, sizes are all inflated by a few or more cubic inches of volume, since we all tend to gain about that much on average. What is commonly thought of as slightly above average here is actually big. What is big here is actually huge. And what is huge here almost doesn’t even exist without PE.

6-10 cubic inches: slightly below average to normal. A normal dick.
10-14 cubic inches: normal to slightly above average. A really good normal dick.
14-18 cubic inches: big dick that gets reactions from some women. They go a little crazy for this size and up, similar to how we get a little stupid for really beautiful women.
18-22 cubic inches: huge dick that gets reactions from most women. These guys commonly have a reputation among women with casual sex opportunities based on size, if so desired.
22+ cubic inches: enormous dick that almost every woman will comment on upon seeing or after first intercourse. The big dick reaction of cock lust transcends to a level of awe and fear for many women, who are realistically experiencing the single biggest cock of their lifetimes. Beyond this level LTR size compatibility becomes an increasingly common issue.

Around roughly that 22 cubic inch level, guys above that would say that almost every woman they’d been with had commented on their size. Guys below that (that were still big or even huge) would report that they knew women were having big dick reactions to their penis, but they wouldn’t SAY anything about it because they didn’t want to stroke their ego too much.

The naturally big guys who discovered the effect it had on women at a young age - they tended to be so cocksure and confident. As an aside note, some naturally big guys never discovered this or didn’t care about it, or discovered it later in life. But those that figured it out right away, knew deep in their bones they were a desired commodity. Women had a reaction to their dick size, based in experience of higher quality orgasms from bigger dicks (all other things being equal) or even the expectation of better sex or better orgasms. The natural bigs began to expect that effect on the average woman, based on it happening over and over again. It was interesting to see the occasional post about when they realized they were big and had this effect, what specific experience finally completed that puzzle for them. After realizing this, over time they developed this next level of confidence based on the expectation of this effect. It seemed very similar to how hot girls know they’re hot. It’s completely obvious to them because of the non stop stream of male attention. They understand and use the effect they have on men. Well I noticed that same thing happening in stories from these naturally big guys.

So I’m feeling rather motivated today.

Are these calculations using length in Non Bone Pressed or using length in a Bone pressed measurement. Also am I correct in thinking the average fat pad for most men is between 0.75-1 inches, as how much fat pad a man has would significantly effect the above calculations if we are using BP measurements.

How do you calculate penis volume?

I’m 7 5/8" x 5 1/5" mid girth.

More than likely, use NBPEL if you want to use the above for the reveal/on sight reactions, and BPEL for the ‘once you put it in’ reactions. Girls can feel BPEL, but they can’t see it.

That’s a good point.
Also I like to add that most guy’s who measured their dicks over at big dick problems at probably did so incorrectly. Many likely would have measured from the side, likely adding 0.3-0.5 inches of length. As such those guidelines outlined above by beadredragon about what sizes in cubic inches women are impressed by on sighting may perhaps be slightly lower if we were to use NBP measurements.
For example maybe 13.25 cubic inches instead of 14 cubic inches
17.25 instead of 18 cubic inches
21.25 instead of 22 cubic inches
As I think Beardedragon’s guidelines for what size in cubic inches women are impresses by on sighting are useful tools for PE motivation, I would like them to be as accurate as possible for lack of better words.
Does anyone have any thoughts as to whether my logic may be correct?

The amount of cubic inch inflation is unknown. As it would drastically change based on the girth of the penis in question. So that proposed guideline would not work.

Additionally, I doubt a half inch of length would reduce a cubic inch measurement by .75ci. That sounds very conservative in most cases. Input your data at sizemeupinfo. Com and reduce your size by .5” and then increase the girth and do the same. You’ll see what I mean.