Marinera
In the beginning, I had those thoughts too, I admit.
But in respect of the spirit I encounter in this forum, I think most are honest in measuring.
The center of interest here is growth, not sheer size.
So there is no interest in cheating - one cheats only on himself.
Therefore I eliminated only a few (less than 10) incredible measurements (L/G 1/1inch), where I had to suppose the entries were false at all.
Even the huge ones (13x7 and so on) are in such a small number they don’t trouble the reliability.
I guess there is some room for interpretation here, as always in statistics.
I can deliver percentile values in half-inch steps too, but that may wait, as I am not willing to type them on the cell-phone - I am commuting right now…
Send me word if you’d like to read that data too.
Best regards and “buon appetito”
R65
PS: by re-reading my own post I realize that there is a certain absurd logic in answering this question by statistics. Maybe a moderator should adress the question directly to our female members and then we would probably have a ways more solid discussion base. I mean, size preference is probably as less a question of mathematics as taste preferences in other things regarding the anatomy of our sex partners may be. Typical engineer’s approach - always the math first because what you can calculate you have to consider as reliable… :-)
Modified forum rule #69: Your avatar must show a JUICY ass, may it be female, male, mermaid, even sheep or horses are accepted. :-)
My logbook: Richard65 - the roadbook