Kinsey Penis Girth

Thanks every body for the encouragement. I have started the newbie routine. Will keep you posted.

Kinsey’s girth measurement was maximum point of circumference. Just to clarify that point that seems to get missed. There is no proof that this was ever done mid-shaft or that lifestyles was. There is however proof that that it was at maximum shaft as observed by Jamison and gebhard in Kinsey’s marginal tabulations.

This changes everything. Like my BEG is 6.25” but MSEG is 5.25”… i would have recorded 6.25” then… which is untrue..

I understand that it may not appear to be true. Many people including myself have that “ohh no way I’m that much bigger thought ”,

So if you need some sort mental gymnastics to continue feeling like you’re not enough. Here are some hypothetical reasons why the Kinsey average size may be lower than you would expect:

1.) The average size has gotten bigger since the 50

2.) People didn’t know girth was as important then so weren’t as liberal with measurements.

It is true. You can actually find the methodology if you type Kinsey Data: Marginal Tabulations 1938-1963. This data is also cited by other studies. What isn’t true is a bunch of random sites that say “mid-shaft” or whatever methodology when they’ve never looked at the actual study or the data isn’t available.

Alright alright, I’ll take it then, i could be an outlier in a penis study, who would have thought !!