Lenght vs girth, Light vs extreme

I was thinking of ways to help improve my length, and i think i might have an idea. I was thinking that if you train lighter but longer you will gain mainly length,if you train with more force and shorter you will gain more girth. Kinda like lifting weights, low weight high rep for definition, high weight low rep for strength. I know that the penis isn’t a muscle, but things like this work for almost anything. Like a car, if you drop it you get better handling but a bumpier and bouncier ride, if you raise it you get a smoother ride but less handling. Or if you put your wheels out farther you get more stable and controllable handling but have to make bigger turning radious, if your tires are in more then less controllable but smaller turning radious… those are some examples that have nothing to do with anything PE but just and example how when you change things, one thing goes up and the other goes down. So I was wondering if the people who mainly gain length would say they PE light but longer, and if you gain more girth you PE with more pressure?

…..I fail to see the connection. I think your wrong in this case, although I do see the point your trying to make.

Maybe a better statement would be; Less strain, quicker heal, faster gain :) I don’t agree with this either. :)

James,
I don’t think there is a connect between the intensity and the result (length or girth), but rather there is definitely a connection between the exercise and the result.
You couldn’t, for instance say that just because you hung with heavy weight you where going to gain girth, could you?
If the point you where trying to make was that girth exercises generally require more intensity than length exercises, then yes, that may be the case. I know it certainly is for me.

The best idea I have read lately (and for a long time actually) is an extended (like 30 minutes extended!) warmup followed by a short, but intense stretching session. There is scientific evidence to show that this does work. Shiver posted a quote somewhere (I can’t find the damn thing now!) about how when tissues are heated to 45 degrees C, and then stretched, plastic deformation takes place.
That is, stretches and stays stretched. Exactly what we are looking for.

I don’t think this would work, same muscle fibers aren’t present in your penis.

I made myself a rice sock today, and did a 30 minute warm up, but I don’t know if it was 45 degrees C or not, that would be pretty hot, what around 105 degrees F? Regardless, it felt really good, and my unit seemed more elastic.

Well I was just thinking this… because this kind of thing applies to ALMOST anything, make something wider you gain stability but lose maneuverability, make it narrower you gain manoverability but lose stability. For athlete, theres quick and agile but not as strong, or really strong but not as agile. I’m not saying I’ve figured this out… but I think that the same type of thing will apply to Pe. This theory was for jelqing..sorry I didn’t state it. So for the hanging since its not length vs girth, its only for length, it wold work like this, lighter weights = longer time period, heavier weight = shorter time period. But theres limits on how much you could take. But i was orignially talking about jelqing though which could be for either length or girth. Anyways that was just my idea…it works with the theory of higher erection for girth and lower erection for length, just another way of looking at it. If i have time I will try and test it out.

When lifting weights higher or lower reps do not make a difference in definition. That would be your body fat levels. Muscles do not shape differently depending on different exercises.

Bold statement. You have any evidence to go along with it bro?

Well BRO, what makes you think that lifting with a different rep scheme will change the appearance of you muscles? Of course depending on the they way you lift you will recruit more or less fast or slow twitch muscle fibers, but that is not going to make you look more or less cut. Being able to see definition is a function of your body fat levels. You might be able to make a correlation that higher reps= more calories burned= lower body fat levels, but that would be a weak correlation at best and not a causation statement.

Sorry for thread hijacking.

Considering every school and every fitness instructor teaches differently, I am assuming (maybe a bad assumption) that there is EVIDENCE (i.e. tests/experiments) done that make them believe differently from you. I may be wrong and I am not trying to make you sound stupid, but I really am curious if there is any evidence to your statements or if you are just assuming. If you do have evidence (i.e. tests/articles/experiments) please post links or try to show them to me the best way possible.

I guess I should not have made the statement if I did not have studies handy to back up my claims, but I do not care enough to do the research, so you can win the argument if you would like. If you want to find research in opposition to me that would be fine, and I would respect your side.

[QUOTE=Andrew69

The best idea I have read lately (and for a long time actually) is an extended (like 30 minutes extended!) warmup followed by a short, but intense stretching session. There is scientific evidence to show that this does work. Shiver posted a quote somewhere (I can’t find the damn thing now!) about how when tissues are heated to 45 degrees C, and then stretched, plastic deformation takes place.
That is, stretches and stays stretched. Exactly what we are looking for.
[/QUOTE]

This is pertaining to muscles, but I had a chiropractor I went to a long time ago, that I was going to for back pain, tell me to soak in a tub of hot water for 20 minutes to relax my back muscles. He followed that statement up by saying that 10 minutes wouldn’t do. I’ve thought about this before in relation to hanging, but then just shook it off as comparing apples to oranges. Your post really has me thinking about this now. It can only help to warmup longer, right? Maybe the extended warmup is far too underated and not spoken enough of?

What about a modified heating session? Say 20 minutes warmup (hot tub of water or heating lamp) followed by 10 minutes heating during hanging, then last 10 minutes of hanging the heat lamp cut off. The total of 30 minutes warmup will have been achieved, and a 10 minute slow cool down for lock in. Follow the hanging session with traction wrapping to stabilize the lock in. I’m really thinking seriously about this extended heating. Since the test showed intense stretching works with this, I’m assuming they did a good complete scientific study and tested the less intense stretching and arrived at the conclusion that intense works best with the extended warmup. To mimic this study would mean using max weight hanging for best results with the extended warmup.

Under these conditions, once again using the study as a guide, perhaps the 20 min/max weight hanging session could be reduced to 15 minutes (5 minute cool down). This would be 25% less time our dicks have to stay under stress and that can only be a good thing if the gain results are good.

I just did some searching at Thunder’s and I see Shiver has been pursuing extended heat for some time now. I’m not sure if Shiver has done any hanging or not.