Natural Way to Promote Growth? Just have Sex?

I am curious if anyone could point me in the direction of the threads that talk about dick size in regards to Nature vs Nurture ideas.

For instance, take two guys. Alfred BigCock and Steven SmallDingy.
Now Alfred lost his virginity early on around the age of 15 or 16. After which he was always somewhat regularly having sex.

Steven on the other hand picked up masturbation when he was 15 and didn’t lose his virginity til he was 20 or 21.

Now lets just say Alfred has a 7x5 and Steven a 5x4. Apart from genetics taking up most of the variable in determing dick size. How much of the size is left to Nurture ( I.E. the sex vs the masturbation ) I ask this because most of the time vaginas are going to be much softer and smoother to the penis than a rough calloused hand is.

My theory is that sex can promote growth in the penis. My guess is that because the vagina will expand to fit the penis, the penis will grow to fill the vagina.
And that masturbation will not promote growth to the penis because of how much harder the hand is.

I suppose this is somewhat similar to a will masturbation hinder my gains, but that is not what I am asking. Nor am I asking will sex hinder my gains either. I am trying to ask:

Does anyone else believe sex does promote gains and why?

I don’t.

If anything, having sex regularly helps cure our insecurities. I never felt the need for a bigger tool whenever I’ve been in a significant relationship (couple months), it’s during the in-between relationships that my insecurities resurface and that I crawl the web in search of information about average size, does size matter, how to get it bigger and so on.

According to your hypothesis, masturbation should promote growth even more than sex, since the world is already a bit more ‘expanded’ than any vagina.

The idea that masturbation is bad for gains and abstinence and/or intercourses are good is based on not explicited religious beliefs.

So you think having allot of sex will make your dick bigger. This sounds really weird. You say that the vagina expands to fit the penis and that the penis grows to fit the vagina? If the vagina expands so the penis can fit better it would mean the penis is to big, then it should shrink to fit, not grow like you say.

Are you serious with the theory?

No, I don’t believe having sex will promote size in any way.

Most of us will have sex thousands of times in our lives. If sex made our dick grow, we’d all have 11 inch dicks when we’re 80.

Reading up on eunuchs after watching a documentary on the last emperor of China (they employed eunuchs) I discovered that eunuchs who are just castrated by having their testicles cut off actually see shrinkage over time. Whether that is due to hormonal changes or lack of spontaneous erections and erections in general is a bit of debate. I can see where it could be the total lack of erections. That really means that it is keeping the material stretched out to the level that it is naturally designed for versus increasing the size above that.

Being a virgin. I just kind of assume that having sex can act slightly like jelqing. So yeah I’d say it could help with growth slightly in that way but wouldn’t have any drastic changes.

A little of A and a little of B I’m sure. I think it’s possible that not having erections could cause loss of size over time and rock hard, 100% EQ erections could cause expansion over time.

I was with you until the end where you drew the conclusion that the penis grows to fill the surrounding environment (vagina). What?! You mean like a goldfish?

If anything you have three psychological topics in the thread but nothing evolutionary grounded. The guy who lost his virginity at 15-16 is more likely to be consumed with sex for validation and therefore pick up penis enlargement to further his chances of more sex and greater value received. While on the other hand the guy who masturbated too frequently an lost his virginity at 21 is more likely to focus other aspects of securing a mate by winning he over with displays of security or affection. Third current evolutionary theory states that survival of the fittest dictates pronounced features in almost all species. Like the men in overpopulated parts of Africa competing for women who prefer the security of larger penises.

‘The security of larger penises’?!

My thought was somewhat close to this.

The Vagina is kind of like the perfect pumping tube correct? Everytime you fit into one you are packing it to the sides ( at least it feels like it ) Plus her muscles squeeze and pull on your dick. Also the ring of her pelvic bone kind of feels like a jelq when she drags it across the tops and sides of your dick ( not just going straight up in down but more of the grinding against it movements ) at least it feels like that to me…

Orgasms within the vagina made me think that it could increase your size. Most of this is just speculation on my part ( obviously ) but I have noticed that my dick is has always been fatter and plumper after sex than after masturbation. Mostly in part to the orgasm I believe. Because the orgasm is so much stronger in the vagina. It feels to me that the BC muscle pumps stronger and harder during sex which most likely strengthens it more… Finally has anyone ever had an orgasm where they pushed deep into a girl and felt like their unit was elongating internally? This happened to me the last time I had sex which prompted this whole idea..

Lastly why would the hand not work the same as the vagina? A few thoughts I had of this is, the hand does not create a suction to the penis. The hand does not pull on the penis the same way as a vagina. The hand however stimulating and even with pornography has never created the same strength in orgasm as sex has ( at least for me ) In fact when orgasming from hand stimulation the penis has to push and pump against the hand, which I am sure most can agree a hand does not have the same squishy give that a vagina does. So you could assume that the hand doesn’t let the penis expand in the same way a vagina would.

I have heard that masturbation can give your dick a slight curve, but the curve could be explained from a multitude of things such as getting erections when wearing pants and how you decide to deal with that. Some members here have expressed how they think popping their units into their waste bands when erect caused their upward curve. Following that idea also prompted me to think that: When we were younger and had spontaneous erections if we had placed our dicks into a tube or a vagina it would have kept it naturally straight.

Yes I am serious with this theory, thank you very much for your reply. It definitely showed a major mistake in the theory. For senior members who have seen gains from PE some posted that their wives noticed the changes but seemed to adapt to them slowly over time. That is where I got the “vagina expands to fit the penis” idea. Their units are slightly bigger than their wives so SHE had to change to accommodate the size. Where as most men will have to grow to the size of the vagina.

I think that sex promotes minimal natural growth in dicks. Similar to the way PE does just not as quick. PE I feel is the fastest ( even though it takes months to years ) it still promotes growth quicker than any other activity in the world I believe. However the growth in our dicks from the natural stimulation of sex would end somewhere in our 20’s where our bodies are no longer in their so called “prime” and growing but are on the decline or rather maintaining stages of life. During puberty our bodies are growing at their fastest rate possible are they not? So that is why I prompted the idea of the 15 year old losing his virginity. If he was to maintain sex regularly could the sex act like a pumping jelqing tube that stimulated the dick to grow? He would be promoting growth to his unit during the years of his life where he is growing the quickest. Is this not some of the reason for debate on telling our sons of PE during puberty? So they can have the added bonus of growth to help further their gains?

Yes the security of larger penises.
The theory goes that women most often in young adulthood choose mates that will help them feel secure by protecting them physically short term, but later in life by men who will keep them satisfied financially and sexually. I know it’s strange sounding at first.

Patientlygrowing- Idk what I’m going to do with you. I love the creativity and innovative thinking. Your theories don’t make a lot of rational sense. The only real suction you get from the vagina is from the wedge shape head being thrust in and pushing out air. When you pull back but not completely out suction is created momentarily during the motion. Haven’t you ever made a girl queef? I guarantee that wasn’t a suction sound.When you talk about bottoming out and elongating I think you’re talking about pelvic tilt lining up with her pubic bone and allowing for maximum penetration.

If your theory is correct we could all gain a lot from fleshlights. Could we not?

Protecting them physically with a large penis?! Are they short on clubs in Africa?