New Findings on fibrous collagen penile walls

Hello everyone,

I am new to this forum, but I wanted to post something for your discussion on the structure of the mammalian penis and how it effects erection quality and potentially how it can inform your pursuits to get hung. I hope you guys enjoy the video and hopefully it will spark some discussion. This post really deserves to be posted on the main forum, but I’m still a newbie, so here it is.

Once your ligament stretches are done, then you need to attack the fibrous structure of the penis it’s self, and so one has to somehow distend those tough collagenous fibers in the shaft of your penis.

The way I’m attempting to do that is by hanging weights from my dick, and more recently to hang over a fulcrum (a one inch dowel) while seated.

While watching the video it became clear that the design of the penis (sorry darwinists) is such that whoever built it wants it to stay as it was built.

So us devils will have to get really creative to get what we want!

Interesting watch. Thanks for sharing.

That’s interesting stuff for sure. I don’t understand though, is she saying that the two layers are always at a 0 and 90 degree orientation, both erect and flaccid, or does the orientation change from a 45 degree crosshatch to the 0/90 during erection?

Don’t be surprised if you have only one layer or three layers, the number of layers can differ.That’s probably why easy and hard gainers exist.

Tunica Differences

I appreciated the way she protected the rhinos’ privacy.

Well this seems to suggest bundled stretches would be best for lengthening. That or long term stretching like ADS or hanging

Haha well said A-unit

You know, her research didn’t tell us anything we didn’t know about penises. It told us why, which isn’t helping much with PE. At least not without medical or surgical intervention. Penises are rigid and don’t like to bend when erect, and they resist being compressed or elongated. Who knew?

Interestingly, in the video it showed a 2 layer structure (the most common) with an inner longitudinal layer and an outer circular layer, whereas the link above speaks of the specimens having an inner circular layer and outer longitudinal layer. I wonder which is right? There is no suggestion that the 20 specimens from the written study had variations. It also states that those with a 3 layered structure had a longitudinal layer sandwiched between 2 circular layers, suggesting that in fact the slides in the video are more likely to have been labelled wrongly. Although I would have expected the scientist woman to have noticed that!

Maybe someone should contact her with the intention she could contribute here, inconspicuously, of course, for her professional standing.