Penis Charts

Excellent work bny68.

So at the 8” BPEL x 6” MSG size mark: only 2% are thicker and longer.

BP or NBP??

As it’s Thunder’s Place data, I think we can safely assume the length figures are BP.

So a size of 6.2 x 4.7” is approximately the median size by the length plus girth criteria and this has a length:girth ratio of just over 1.3, which I consider just about the most common aspect ratio.

But according to the volume data, that size volumetrically is only around the 11% percentile.

A good indication of how those really big guys massively inflate (pun somewhat intended) the volume percentile ranks. Also note that the 100th percentile for volume has nearly three times the volume of that “median size”.

Seems to be high time for a penis redistribution program?

Congratulations!

Very good, but how % of people mesure correctly.
Before-and-After Measurement Pictures
I see only one correct BPEL !
I have 8.5" BPEL from top sitting but only 8.25" standing.
1/3 measure sitting down.

Measure standing up 112 57.14%
Measure sitting down 58 29.59%
Inconsistent, sometimes one, sometimes the other 26 13.27%
Total Votes: 196.

Excellent work!

This might sound dumb, but I have a question about something that is confusing me.

In volume chart, my size (6.8”x5.1” -> 14.1 ci) is in 45-55th percentile, but in length and girth chart, my size is in 79th percentile. Can someone explain this?

Percentile by Length AND Girth 99.5 % .

This is very good !

:)

Are you going to give it a rest now? Please?

You two ought to get married.

At the worst, that would make the figures only the smallest bit optimistic.

They are still probably the most accurate figures we will find on the internet! :)

:rolling:

Thanks for all the positive comments. I am glad I was able to contribute. I’ll try to get at least a couple more scrubs of the data posted soon as well as work on normalizing the data for real world estimates.

In the volume chart, greater girth will bump your volume up much more than greater length, and thus at the top of the volume chart you will find the super girthy guys, not necessarily the super long guys.

On the Length AND Girth chart, large values in both length and girth equally bump you higher in the chart.

Looking at your stats, your length does very well to bump you up in the Length AND Girth chart, yet you would be surpassed in the volume chart by many guys with shorter but fatter units (yet these people would fail to surpass you in the Length AND Girth charts since you beat them in Length).

Like I said in my original post, I am not a statistician. I often have a difficult time explaining the “whys”, but it is what it is..

I pulled a subset of data to help show the “why”. The volume of 6.8 X 5.1 is 14.07, so I grabbed all the measurements with volumes of 13.97 to 14.17. This is just .01 below to .01 above your estimated volume, a pretty tight range. Although the range was tight, 71 members met this criteria.

Of the 71:
Avg L = 6.63
Avg G = 5.17
Avg V = 14.06

Longer than 6.8” = 29 or 41%
Fatter than 5.1 G = 43 or 61%
Longer AND Fatter than 6.8 X 5.1 = 1 - you are the 100 percentile

In this subset you are the median in volume, slightly above average length and slightly below average girth but NOBODY is both longer and girthier.