Testing bib's LOT theory
Note: Since this was written, LOT theory has been largely refuted. Should you pay attention to LOT theory? If nothing else it is an important part of PE history and spurred discussion. If you read this, it’s sensible to also read the alternate views. If nothing else, you will gain a better understanding of anatomy.
If you havent read the point of kegel thread thingy, go read it now and do the test.
Would anyone who has done this test and knows what angles they need to hit, be it tunica or lig stretching, be interested in testing bibs theory with a thundersplace experiment thingy??
One group would be high LOT doing lig work and the other low LOT, doing tunica work.
Then everyone would post their starting stats and finishing stats after a designated length of time. I would wager that most people will gain, especially in the lig group. This would add weight to bibs theory.
There are downsides to every experiment, like results being warped by cumulative effects of previous routines etc. Please post any ideas and point out any more flaws, I thought of a few while I was typing but lost em. It’s late.
Anyone want to try this?
I would, so thats 1 so far.
Good Luck
SS4
Post will be updated from here down:
**************************************************
LAB RATS ENLISTED SO FAR:
TUNICA GROUP
SS4Jelq
Retsnom
RB
Jackthelad
interesting2001
Good_Knight
Mr Cow
9soon
dancerdc
LIG GROUP
Long2BLong
Pemonsta8
skinneeD
big rig
base
fishhead
Last edited by ThunderSS : 06-11-2013 at . Reason: Swapped spurred for spurned 3rd sentence