Originally Posted by beowulf
Why would the average starting size as stated above of approx. 6.4 inches be so much larger than the oft quoted studies of approx. 5.2 inches? Is something amiss?I would think that more guys who felt that they were below average would be more motivated to practice PE than those are already well above the statistical mean.
Does anyone have thoughts regarding this? Are the studies lying to protect our egos?
The data set he is analyzing is self reported data from members here. It is not a statistically valid data set if the objective is to analyze the range of adult penises of the world population.
Your comment that “I would think that more guys who felt that they were below average would be more motivated to practice PE than those are already well above the statistical mean” has some huge assumptions incorporated in it.
It may be true that more below average guys would be motivated to practice PE. Since every member has not posted stats, we do not know the composition of the members who did not post them. The resultant average size of 6.4” strongly suggests that the below average members did not post their stats (many reasons why) and more of the average to above average members did.
Don’t forget that there many problems (statistically) with self reported data.
If you want to find the average height of adult males, you don’t use all NBA players as the data set. If you want to estimate the average height of NBA players for next season, you can use the average height of nba players from this season or previous seasons to do so.
Initial: 7” BPEL; 6” NBPEL; 5.25” - 5.5” MEG
Current: 7-7/8” BPEL; 7-3/8” NBPEL; 8.5” BPFSL; 6.5” MEG; 6”x5” Flaccid.
Goal: Improved/consistent EQ while managing ED. Secondary: maintain current stats.