Average Gains and Starting Measurements

Yes I am getting a Vachanger soon, and then I will grind out the last of my 2” gains. I cannot wait. :) :) :)

I find if you have to do something whether it is PE or weight lifting, or anything where time is a factor, enjoying it is the key to keep doing it, if you start to dread it you won’t keep going or quality dips. Find a way to enjoy it, and make it part of your day. Don’t go too intense or quick through the progression (relatively) And the gains will come :) I actually lost half an inch and got it back again and it took almost as much time as the first time I gained it. But just keep grinding and experimenting with new ways :)

Thank you for the link!

I read it about two or three months ago. If I recall correctly, the main problem with the provided studies was, that there were no clear statements about measuring methodology and/or EQ-control, therefore I tried to give some details about publications, that I found the most compelling, because:
There were little to no problems with EQ, since participants got it induced pharmacologically or they were young enough to have a good "natural" one, but nevertheless it was controlled in the second case and "the fat pad was pushed to the bone at the maximum".

So, they are basically as good as it gets regarding BPEL-measurement and EQ-considerations and it should give some idea about the "average the most girls are sleeping with", since there was a self-selection bias and I tried to be fair and adjust the scores to a more "real world scenario"=)
And to be even more certain about it, I attempted to verify the results with a sort of independent, but objective (measured), source))
Hope, it was somewhat helpful and I could provide some new info or approaches for evaluation of the data=)

PS if it is a wrong thread, I´m sorry to have posted it here.

PS dear juiice, if you don´t mind and have time, could you please do some percentages tables of thunders data, like this one:

Might be a good visualization, that comes handy.
Thank you for your work!

I’ll try to put one of those tables together cawkzilla. I agree that it could be nice to have a visual like that. However, it might be a little while before I can get the table out, I have a lot of class work at the moment that needs to be done first unfortunately.

Thanks, take your time!

Looking at the average starting stats and average gains, I’m exactly average. I started 6x5nbpel, 7x5bpel. I have gained roughly .6”x.3” nbpel.

Funny how these charts are dead on for average people.

You actually started above average length mate. The length statistics are all BPEL.

You’re talking about the proportional appearance of your penis. That’s pretty important, I admit. That is what hits a person when they look at a penis, I believe.

*wham!*

Hopefully not in the face, of course.

So is this data saying that on average what any person can expect to achieve is approximately a half inch or so in length and a quarter to a half in in girth?

Oh I am sure these starting sizes are skewed compared to regular size studies:
- Many of use probably jam the ruler harder and might even throw in a kegel to get that extra length. Same with measuring girth.
- Some might take their base girth as their main girth as its bigger
- Many might measure too soon after its still larger due to a workout
- Many of us will round up the numbers
- Some will lie about their size not to mention their might be some fake accounts on here.

Lastly and I think this plays quite a big role. Larger guys on average are more obsessed with their penis and are more likely to get here. Larger want even larger while most average guys are more contend with what they have and put more value in other things in life.

All these things makes these starting numbers very skewed compared to reality so don’t let those numbers affect you negatively in any way.. Having spend quite some of my time abroad in spa’s and gym’s all over the world I can tell you around 5.5 Inches BP is really the average in my opinion.

Where do you guys actually measure the MEG?

“Middle” relative to what?

If I measure it relative to my NBPEL (~15cm or 6in.), I get something like 5.1-2 inches (~13cm), but if I use the mid-shaft point of my BPEL (~17cm, 6.75in.) and go 1cm further from the glans towards the base, the result is 13.5cm+ (~5.35in.)

It`s not a big difference, but kinda significant for statistics

My MEG is taken in the thinnest portion of the shaft, at the end of my foreskin mark (I’m uncut).

I´m also uncut, but the point isn’t really a mid-shaft then, isn’t it?=)

Or are you supposed to measure the thinnest portion?

It is easier for me to measure at the end of the foreskin mark and more consistent everytime I wrap the tape around (and turned out to be the thinnest part). My measurement at the actually middle of the shaft is the same as the base, so there is no point to take in the actually middle.

Ah, ok

Makes sense, thanks!