Unified Field Theory of PE

Between all of us, we have more than 1/2 a brain. We should be able to come up with comprehensive theory of application of PE.

For example, based on the ligamentous stretch info, it appears that there is the low, medium and high tension approach. It seems that we should be able to categorize the different approaches in each of those catagories with the corresponding frequency and force range.

Lets just talk about pumping. It is becoming very apparent to me that this MUST fall in the low force, longer duration, frequent application range. I’ve tried to move it to the higher force categories, but you get too much fluid migration, which hinders progress.

Then we have stretching and hanging, which seems to be a approach that can be approached in all three categories.

Anyway, you get my drift. Each application has an appropriate force and duration range, that has its best effect in. Go below it, and little to no results. Go above and risk injury.

I understand each person is unique, yet similar. If this were not so, there wouldn’t be surgery or physical therapy or any medical art. We should be able to agree on some ranges (frequency, force and duration).

We have enough smart guys here that are well versed enough in there particular specialty that we should be able to put together a comprehensive guideline at least indicating force and frequency ranges that seem to have the greatest chance of success.

Anyway, just a thought.

Regards,
Sparkyx

Sparky,

Do you work for the government?

IRS maybe, if I had to guess I’d say you were some type of bureaucrat.

It’s a noble goal, but probably as elusive as the Unified Theory in physics. I think more than half a brain is required. I have a full one myself, yet I don’t have the answers.

No, I think he’s right. Everything has a method. The question is, can you find it? I definently think we have enough intelligent people on this board to break PE down into as close to a science as possible. Everyone is different; true. But, their MUST be a method to the madness.

I agree, and have thought up some ways about it, but it would take time and effort that I do not have at the moment.

Hi my nametwin

I think frequency ranges have been set, more or less. As far as force is concerned, it’s also been more or less determined in pumping and hanging , it’s a tough one when it comes to manual work but there are still guidelines.

Comprehensive theory … well I don’t know, I am not sure there exists a phenomenon that can be fully explained by a single theory, correct me if I am wrong here. Theories can complement each other or contradict. In my opinion there are already few theories in PE. Anything that describes, explains, and predicts can be a theory.

Tube,
Yeah, I’m being lazy too. I was hoping someone would run with the ball. I would do it, but by the time I got around to it, I be too old to care if by dick even worked anymore!

deadeye3200,
Good thing you didn’t have to guess, WAY OFF!

If we could get everyone who has had success and remembers what they did, to post on this thread, we could then sort though and put it in categories and see if we can determine some ranges like, ten pound for hanging for one hour a day begins to see lengthening. Or until they hit at least 5 lbs, no real changes.

The trick would be to glean good info from the “maybe I got 1/8 in. growth”. I’m afraid that is well within a plus or minus error range. However when guys start reporting 1/2 in BPEL, I sit up and take notice.

Some guys seem to go about they experiments with some scientific approach, and that would add to a data base, while other guys don’t know objective from subjective.

Anyway, just thought I run it up my flagpole, uh I mean A flagpole and see who salutes!

Regards,
Sparkyx

I too have thought about it, but the undertaking of such an effort is beyond most of us currently, if we work independently that is. To do this you need to utilize and mobilize us here at Thunder’s, but this won’t happen for awhile. Shame, would be good to have a unified field theory though.

Sparky,
What you are suggesting is like saying. If you curl 35 pounds your biceps will grow 2 inches in 3 months. If you bench press 250 your chest will grow 3 inches in 4 months.
Everybody is different in this sense. Even more so when it comes to your penis.

Think of it like this.
Some guys in here masturbate 8 times a day (Huffduck). Where other guys will only masturbate lets say 5 (Huffduck). Where as most people masturbate 2 to 3 times a week.

Now the heavier masturbates, more or less work their dicks out more than the norm. They will have less sensitivity and probably be able to take more weight.

And what about guys that don’t hardly masturbate at all. They would be very sensitive and couldn’t handle much exertion at all. You just can’t quantify this, you can’t do it with bodybuilding nor could you do it here.

You have a good heart, and good intentions. But you can’t put numbers on this.

I think you can put numbers on this, but it would probably be a range. For example, lets just say the ACL ligament of the knee will begin to stretch with 50lbs of force in 10% of the population, with forces going up to 100lbs will then include the other 90% of the population. There are similarities in response between human beings.

I think the problem here is there are many variables in penis enlargement such as you stated. There are variables we probably have even identified, like maybe a essential fatty acid deficiency makes the soft less pliable, requiring greater forces to cause deformation.

In any endeavour if you add even one or two unknown variables, it makes solving the problem almost impossible to achieve until they are identified.

Oh, well, I guess I just answered my own question and greatly discouraged my quest for the Holy Grail of instant penis enlargement.

I can still dream though!!!

Sparkyx

Sparkyx,

I don’t think any theory can ever fully comprehend how PE works at this stage of it’s awareness. You are all correct that there are too many different variables to understand. The fact is that PE is a closet activity for the most part, we don’t have medical labs researching this or experiments to completely validate any of the data. I was expecting Tube to have some secret laboratory by now in the South Pacific with well endowed rats and a new mysterious alien “Formula-X” that would make everyone hung.

A lot of the mystery of PE has been debunked. We tend to know what works and what doesn’t. There are some developments happening but not like 5 or 6 years ago. Maybe because we have the tools we need now. I mean in essence we are either stretching or expanding. It’s not like we are designing spacecraft for NASA. The only mystery is how much/how often. And that, like most things, depends on the person.

Sorry to squash your hopes for instant enlargement. Try finding some funding for Tube’s research and see if you get lucky.

-Tom “Get me outta here!” Foolery

Intelligence
The ability to apply learned knowledge to manipulate one’s environment or to think abstractly as measured by objective criteria.

Concepts are whats taught here. You learn the anatomy and the concepts. Then you work by trial and error. Closely listen to the guys that have been doing this along time. And do what they have to say. You don’t need Thunder to come over to you’re house and pull on you’re dick to show you how.

Agreed. Sheeesh, I thought this thread was going to be some dry attempt to parallel the physics U.T. with PE. <relieved>

Anyway, there’s basically 2 general “types” of PE:

(1) Traction (elongation of tissues via tractional forces)

and

(2) Impaction (the engorgement of blood-holding tissues within the penis, in an attempt to expand them via outward pressure).

But simplicity is deceptive. There are so many twists & approaches towards those 2 types of PE, based on intensity, duration, volume, frequency, etc., etc., etc. Like the old saying, “The devil is in the details.”

We all have to read, learn, experiment, then keep going back to the drawing board. And what works well for one may do nothing for the next guy.

Go figure.

Bib had a theory that stretching from PE causes microtears. If we stretch often enough, the tissues tend to heal in an extended state.

Another theory came out of Hobby’s post on connective tissue: stretching connective tissue at low tension for a long time and especially with heat causes the tissue to remodel to a larger size.

Connective tissue- FIRST &quot;THREAD OF THE YEAR&quot;

These theories are not incompatible with each other; it’s really just a matter of how much time you have to dedicate to your efforts.

I’ve been thinking a lot about this myself. If you’ll allow me to digress, there are lots of instances where tissues like the tunica and fascia enlarge naturally. Think of a simple case—when you gain weight. The fascia under the skin in your gut expands. The connective tissue surrounding organs grows as well. This is a perfect example of connective tissue growing under low stress applied over a long period of time.

I recently read somewhere that collagen fibers are piezo-electric. Stretch them and they generate electricity. Perhaps the electrical impulses induce growth factors?

Well. Now I’m really wondering. But if you’re interested in working on a theory, I’d be happy to join in.

Interesting point about fat. I have made similar observations before about sustained forces on the body. I am in the low force long duration camp, even to the point of constant tension.