Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Why are EQ gains often disregarded?

Why are EQ gains often disregarded?

I see it fairly often on here and other forums, someone will say something along the lines of “I gained .25” but that was probably just from better EQ. For one thing I don’t understand how someone can determine whether their gains are from EQ vs cell division/microtears etc. Either way it shouldn’t matter, you put in the time and work. and as a result your dick is now bigger.


Started (Dec 2017): 5.0 BPEL X 4.1 MSEG

Now (5 months of PE) 6.0 BPEL X 4.25 MSEG

Originally Posted by cd1992
I see it fairly often on here and other forums, someone will say something along the lines of “I gained .25” but that was probably just from better EQ. For one thing I don’t understand how someone can determine whether their gains are from EQ vs cell division/microtears etc. Either way it shouldn’t matter, you put in the time and work. and as a result your dick is now bigger.

If you knew that back in the day for example, you had a 6” dick, and now you had a 5.5” dick and been having EQ probs. Then you started a Pe prpgram and noticed improved EQ and you were back to 6”. That is not a gain, it is a restoration of the size you once had.

Yes you are damned proud to have it and rightfully can celebrate it, but the accepted classification is restored length.


Initial: 7” BPEL; 6” NBPEL; 5.25” - 5.5” MEG

Current: 7.5” BPEL; 7” NBPEL; 8.25” BPFSL; 6.25” - 6.5” MEG w/ c-ring.

Goal: Improved/consistent EQ while managing ED. Secondary: maintain current stats.

I hadn’t considered people might be talking about regaining lost length due to erection issues.


Started (Dec 2017): 5.0 BPEL X 4.1 MSEG

Now (5 months of PE) 6.0 BPEL X 4.25 MSEG

I think that restore length should not be portrayed as gains. In fact, rested length shouldn’t even be mentioned as part of a PE protocol. It is misleading and rather false.

There might be other instances in which an individual has been measuring with a 90% erection instead of a 100%, and once he has a 100% erection then of course he measures bigger and attribute it to “better EQ” which is completely unprofessional, cheesy job. In order to properly measure BPEL it has to be with a 100% erection. Otherwise is inaccurate.

There is no such thing as bigger size due to a better EQ. Size always has to be measured under 100% Erection. This should be simple basic common sense but with the world we are living in….


06/08/2020 BPFSL: 22cm (8.66") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 08/07/2020 BPFSL: 23cm (9.05") => 09/07/2020 BPFSL: 23.9cm (9.40")

Goal: 1 Foot x 7.5 Inches (30.48cm x 19.05cm)

P.S.: Original start of PE is Circa 1998AD. Aprox size was BPEL: 17.78cm (7") EG: 12.44cm (4.9")

Delete


Initial: 7” BPEL; 6” NBPEL; 5.25” - 5.5” MEG

Current: 7.5” BPEL; 7” NBPEL; 8.25” BPFSL; 6.25” - 6.5” MEG w/ c-ring.

Goal: Improved/consistent EQ while managing ED. Secondary: maintain current stats.


Last edited by 32quarters : 03-14-2021 at .

Originally Posted by igigi
I think that restore length should not be portrayed as gains. In fact, rested length shouldn’t even be mentioned as part of a PE protocol. It is misleading and rather false.

There might be other instances in which an individual has been measuring with a 90% erection instead of a 100%, and once he has a 100% erection then of course he measures bigger and attribute it to “better EQ” which is completely unprofessional, cheesy job. In order to properly measure BPEL it has to be with a 100% erection. Otherwise is inaccurate.

There is no such thing as bigger size due to a better EQ. Size always has to be measured under 100% Erection. This should be simple basic common sense but with the world we are living in….

I so disagree. Most men find out what true 100% erection is after PE. To me that’s certainly growth.


Started 7.75x5.75

Currently: 9.75bpX6.75eg My Picture Thread

Goal:10.0bpX7.25mseg Building a thicker unit, click by click, pump by pump, jelq by jelq!

Imagine if there is a genetic limit to ones penile length and PE simply allows one to actualize it.


Big cock, tight abs, fit body, strong mind.

Originally Posted by Titleist
I so disagree. Most men find out what true 100% erection is after PE. To me that’s certainly growth.

So if I live in a building that has 100 floors, but I never went beyond floor 80 and somebody tells me that there are 20 more floors, it means that the building suddenly by magic grew 20 floors taller? or is it that I just never knew those floors were there?


06/08/2020 BPFSL: 22cm (8.66") BPEL: 22cm (8.66") EG: 15.8cm (6.25") => 08/07/2020 BPFSL: 23cm (9.05") => 09/07/2020 BPFSL: 23.9cm (9.40")

Goal: 1 Foot x 7.5 Inches (30.48cm x 19.05cm)

P.S.: Original start of PE is Circa 1998AD. Aprox size was BPEL: 17.78cm (7") EG: 12.44cm (4.9")

Originally Posted by igigi
So if I live in a building that has 100 floors, but I never went beyond floor 80 and somebody tells me that there are 20 more floors, it means that the building suddenly by magic grew 20 floors taller? or is it that I just never knew those floors were there?

I think the analogy is that the building was capable of having another 20 floors but the prior circumstances prevented those additional floors from being built.

Believe me I wish it was unlimited but we don’t see PE resulting in 11” we just don’t. As you get older length is lost, with various diseases length is lost, if PE prevents those loses or reverses them, I think it’s fair to view those as successful PE endeavors.


Big cock, tight abs, fit body, strong mind.

Originally Posted by igigi
So if I live in a building that has 100 floors, but I never went beyond floor 80 and somebody tells me that there are 20 more floors, it means that the building suddenly by magic grew 20 floors taller? or is it that I just never knew those floors were there?

Poor analogy. Agree to disagree.


Started 7.75x5.75

Currently: 9.75bpX6.75eg My Picture Thread

Goal:10.0bpX7.25mseg Building a thicker unit, click by click, pump by pump, jelq by jelq!

Originally Posted by igigi
I think that restore length should not be portrayed as gains. In fact, rested length shouldn’t even be mentioned as part of a PE protocol. It is misleading and rather false.

There might be other instances in which an individual has been measuring with a 90% erection instead of a 100%, and once he has a 100% erection then of course he measures bigger and attribute it to “better EQ” which is completely unprofessional, cheesy job. In order to properly measure BPEL it has to be with a 100% erection. Otherwise is inaccurate.

There is no such thing as bigger size due to a better EQ. Size always has to be measured under 100% Erection. This should be simple basic common sense but with the world we are living in….

Imho EQ is an indicator of mental and physical health and well-being. So if your mind and body aren’t being treated well your EQ will suffer. Gaining that back isn’t new growth at all.

Oh, and how turned on you are. Women more into your preferences for attraction turn you on more, yielding stronger EQ and bigger erections.


Last edited by djrobins : 03-15-2021 at .
Top
Similar Threads 
ThreadStarterForumRepliesLast Post
Physiologic Indicators (PIs) to help growth!sparkyxPenis Enlargement25312-08-2020 11:18 AM
Could too much girth gains worsen EQ because of imbalance of inner and outer penis?RechnerPenis Enlargement Basics710-18-2016 09:47 AM
Are Pumping Gains Permanent? Wrong QuestionLongVehiclePenis Pumps4404-03-2010 03:52 PM
To Those Focused on Length Gains Who Have Dorsal ThickeningAlrdybigPenis Enlargement003-13-2010 11:45 PM
Gains stopped, EQ went downforestlovingPenis Enlargement Basics101-31-2010 11:55 AM

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:43 PM.