Originally Posted by dickerschwanz
If you are in for the long run the lowest intensity needed to gain(or get positive PI ‘s) is what you want to do.
Just going as fast as possible for highest weight will probably just increase the strength of your dick.
Dikerschwanz that is your opinion based on the method that you follow. I would say at the very least you would probably have the least likelihood of hurting yourself which would definitely better your chances of being in it for the long run. However, some of the other methods probably have an entirely different picture of what they consider the long run.
For example the hardcore hangers are at the other extreme. There are people who have reported decent gains with that. Mind you that is not something that I do so I am only going off of what I have read about.
However, if you take the theory of lowest intensity to the extreme then someone could end up hanging almost extender level tension for 6 months to a year because it is producing results. Mind you these results might be 1/10 what they would have produced in that same time frame if they had been trying to reach fatigue in the first two sets.
I personally think there is 3 paths that can lead to results.
1. Lowest weight possible to achieve results. Mind you if you really think this through to the extreme you might be getting the absolutely slowest results going this route. At what time frame do you compare for results and then decide I am no longer getting results. At the lowest weight possible you might achieve 1/16th of an inch in a year and that would be an indicator to keep on plugging away. Most likely most people are going to want to be at least a tad beyond the absolute lowest weight possible. To me this route usually requires greater amounts of time under tension to make up for this low weight or you are really going to crawl towards your goal. To me this is akin to extenders.
2. Middle ground of trying to get that minimum 10 hours per week. Try to achieve fatigue within your first couple sets and then ride fatigue for the remaining sets. Usually people do not get to this within the first month or two of their hanging career. It takes time to build up to this and you need to learn to listen to your body. What it takes to achieve fatigue within the first couple sets will vary over time. Here the weight being used is not the issue. This is not a contest of achieving the highest weight possible. All that matters is what is the minimum amount of weight needed to achieve fatigue by that 2nd set. My personal preferred method.
3. Hardcore hanging - I don’t follow this method so I could be wrong on this. I believe they are looking to hit maybe 2 sets for the entire day. I don’t believe they even advocate split sessions. So they want to achieve fatigue as quickly as possible. For them fatigue by the end of the second set would be to late. I am not saying their goal is to be in a weight lifting contest but they will definitely be chasing higher weights quicker. I am pretty sure that even the people following this method are following some protocol in the amount of weight they increase per week. So their is something to reign this in.
If you take method 1 to the extreme and really try to achieve the least amount of tension possible I can’t see how it wouldn’t be the slowest method. However, I am positive even method 1 is actually going for more than the least amount of tension possible because most of them wouldn’t consider some millimeter gain for the year enough for them.
I personally practice method 2 however from my experience even when I am not riding fatigue for even months at a time I still gain. This round of hanging that I am doing now I haven’t gotten back to a level of riding fatigue within the first 2 sets yet. Heck, I think I have only needed to reduce weight maybe twice in the last month or so. Yet I still gained. So in reality I am probably right now in between method 1 and 2 since I have come back to hanging. However, my goal is to definitely get back to method 2.