Originally Posted by el jeringas
No I’m just saying that for PE there’s usually a time/intensity threshold that is optimal for gaining. A”sweet spot” that has to do with a jelly like state after the session. If I do to much I turtle which I look at as a negative pi. I don’t know if anyone believes that a guy who goes crazy with the weights gains better than one who does just enough stretching.
I personally don’t see turtling as a negative. The whole idea of penis healing in short or lengthened state which is where the don’t turtle idea comes from I believe is bro science at its best. I usually turtle after I hang. The only good news is what I consider to be turtling now would have been my normal flaccid a year ago due to growth.
I have always imagined things as a bell curve. Some of us will require higher weights and intensities than others. That is why there are hard gainers. But I am not just talking about a bell curve with hard gainers and quick gainers. I am talking about plotting routines on a curve taking in account time under tension and the amount of tension. This is why I find extender gains interesting compared to hanger gains. With the exception of some routine outliers the time under tension and the amount of tension are basically inverse using these different methods.
I also believe in a “sweet spot” where people are hitting near to maximum efficiency. However, I am a classic example of probably never being close to maximum efficiency and still gaining.
I believe that this “sweet spot” can vary from person to person and the “sweet spot” can change depending on where you are in your PE career. Part of the philosophy of hanging is gains will be achieved that are going to require a future higher load or different angle to get more gains. Whether it is tissue toughening or limiting factors start resisting together you will find that certain methods will no longer be effective. I think this is why some get those newbie gains and then the routine completely dries up for them. They need to increase tension or time under tension to break through that plateau.
There are a wide variety of PE methods. Even within one method such as hanging there are different methodologies in regards to weights and sets. Even people that follow the same methodology can do it to different degrees of effort. Then you throw in consistency and adapting to feel and you start getting many different individual programs. However, even with all these different forms of PE and different variations inside each type, people gain following a wide variety of methods.
To me the question then become is there a more efficient method for that individual. I might gain just doing light stretching. I never did gain from stretching and I did it off and on over 20 years. Now maybe I needed to stick with it longer. Perhaps I would have gained an 1/8th of an inch in a year if I just stuck with it. Yes that is a gain and that is something to be proud of. But I just gained an 1/8th of an inch in the last month in what was basically a very bad month of hanging due to a vein issue.
Both gains of 1/8th of an inch measure the same. However, I will take the one that happens faster. At the same time in this thread I personally believe there is someone who is pushing the hanging to fast. To me he is at the end of that curve and he might have great gains for it eventually but he also might hurt himself. However, that is just my opinion and he might end up having explosive growth following his methods.
************************************************** ************************************************** **
As a disclaimer it seems to me that hanging in general is my “sweet spot”. After reading a year of other peoples results and lack of results I can see that not everyone is getting the same results from hanging. I truly wish I knew why. I always considered myself a hard gainer when it came to jelqing and stretching. So when I got the quick gains with hanging I personally felt how could it not be this effective for everyone. Now I realize that many people could try my very same routine and have almost no gains. That is always a possibility.
However, they might achieve similar gains by upping the weights and sets. I just hope they do this responsibly and don’t hurt themselves. I will also say I have never read of similar gains under very low hanging weight and time. Which is why I was thinking that Monty71466 needed to work his way up to higher weights. I say this to Monty71466 with the thinking that the ADS which is the majority of his time spent is probably producing the most minimal of gains if any at all.