Hey,
I contacted swm and talked a bit about his routine (got banned by him).
I like the theory, but I think it is hard to pull off.
It fits well in a ipr-cycle or in the first weeks of hanging to condition yourself (to avoid hanger attachment fatigue caused by to many sets early on and be more efficient as long routines aren’t needed yet).
In my eyes the routine is a good way to condition yourself for higher weights.Therein lies the problem.
In the long run (i.e. after 6 months when most hanger see gains and start to cement) you will need more time under tension to gain further (bib’s solution: riding fatigue to very low weights) and therefore more sets and not necessarily weight increasements.
45-60 Min are sufficient for the first months, but then it makes more sense to increase time first to avoid going up in weights too fast.
I think most of the experienced extender-user and hanger agree when I say that 2-3 sets is not enough over a longer period to induce gains beyond the newbie-stage.
The efficient time under tension to create and cement (!) gains is very limited with this routine.
Don’t forget: You will need a warm-up set too (at least 10 Min).
In my eyes swm tries to convince beginner to start hanging early on in their career to sell the easy attainable newbie-gains as direct result of his hanging routine although they could have achieved the similar results in the same time with a more safe and easily executed newbie-routine for example( without risking a hardcore conditioning that follows a hanging routine and risking injuries or negative pi’s like numbness, bad eq).
All in all, I think the progressive routine is a nice sales pitch as the main reason why most of the pe guys avoid hanging is the time that is needed to be invested on a regular basis.
Please ask swm for some good logs that prove his theories.
Unfortunately he didn’t send me any links. Did you find good threads?
If not, it seems like you have to take his word on this one ;)