Originally Posted by SimonClass
One thing I want to add, I’m very happy that you are willing to discuss your theory with me and I respect your efforts to write in this thread here.
First, I’ve said this many times, this theory is not mine. I enjoy trying to help you. I’ve pointed out why I think you are having troubles (you are looking for exacts), and thats pretty much all I can do. I explained to you how I found my approximate exit point (again, using tests that aren’t mine). This was all said above:
Originally Posted by myself
I think I understand where you might be having difficulties. You are looking for exacts, and in this case, there surely isn’t any. IMO, these two tests: the mirror test and the palpation test aren’t completely accurate. I can’t see how they would be. Maybe with more experience and time, one individual could know exactly what he is looking for when feeling and looking at the pubic region. But I don’t think thats going to happen. Not to many guys like other men feeling them up.
Originally Posted by SimonClass
But there is something which seems strange to me. You were telling us your theory but you never came with any graphic and the more we are talking about this theme, the more I feel that you always change your mind about the test. When I brought the graphic about the x-ray from the pubic bone with the drew in black arrow, you were telling me that this front face is the area which counts for your test. Then I told you that this area can not be bigger than 1.5 inches long, it seemed you ignored my assumption for a couple of days. Then you came back and were telling me, that this front face is only 0.75 inches long. I think this information is correct, my guess of 1.5 inches was a wrong evaluation, that’s true, but it went into the right direction.
This is a forum. I write articles and I have a free PE site. When I write articles, I try to provide graphics and any other means necessary to get my point accross. When I am talking on the forum I expect some effort on the part of the people I am helping. In this case, I did provide plenty of graphics to help explain my thoughts. I can provide more, if you can help me understand what you are having trouble with. I am very willing to help explain my ideas and my views. As I stated above, I can only speak with MY experience of this test. I know others claim they have accomplished a good accuracy. I think I have too. You obviously have not. Why? Like I stated before, I think you are looking for exacts in a general test. This test is sort of like writing a creative story to test your creativity. The test isn’t exact, but we could get a good idea of how creative you are.
Originally Posted by SimonClass
Now with your new information in mind, I’m asking me how your test can judge how much lig potential an individual might have, I mean 0.75 inches is not a big distance, especially when you remember my assumption ( you said that I’m right about this!) that it’s absolutely impossible that a penis can sit at the top of the pubic bone. When keeping this in mind, may be the penis is hanging 0.2-0.5 inches below the top of the pubic bone when flaccid, this would mean, that you only have an 0.5-0.3 inch area to palpate.
This makes your test very inaccurate when palpating this area.
The ligament potential references to LOT theory (and ligament PE theory). Let’s make an assumption that the suspensory ligament is the easiest part of your pelvic area to stretch. Thus, being the easiest way to make gains if you have good lig potential. What decides your lig potential? We aren’t sure, but we can make a good assumption that its your attachment point. Why your AP? Because the higher up it is, the lower it can be stretched. Thus when you have a high AP, you have a bigger area to stretch.
Now, when talking about the .75 inches above, I was talking about the front face. This was my estimation, and this was pretty consistent amongst the bodies I was looking at.
The entire front pubic bone (from the top of the front face to the bottom), was approx 1.5 inches. Again, this was my estimation, but it was pretty consistent amongst all the bodies.
Laterally, the pubic bone seemed to be 1 -1.25 inches across. This again was my estimate. These are all estimates.
I don’t understand where you are getting the .5 - .3 inch area to palpate. Research the pubic symphysis a little more and I am sure you will see that the area has much more than that. Heck, I can feel more than that on my front face.
Originally Posted by SimonClass
For now, I would say this test has no value, may be I’m wrong about this, but like I said before, you are doing nothing to illustrate your theory/test, which I think is very sad. You only gave us some inaccurate information about what we can feel when doing this test without providing any single graphic and it was and still is our job to guess what you are meaning when palpating this area. At the moment I’m feeling like I’m in a panel game or something.
I don’t think any of the information I provided was inaccurate. If it was, I apologize. Everyday I learn more information in my quest for PE knowledge. I learned a lot on my recent experience with the cadavers.
I am sorry you haven’t been able to get a better understanding through our conversations. In actuality, that is what I am aiming for. A better understanding for you, and a better understanding for me. Self improvement.
Besides what I have told you, I don’t know what else to say.
You feel,
You then look in the mirror,
You can then also look at skeleton’s and anatomy dissections (as we have done),
And through all this you should have a good estimate. It’s pre-science.
We have been provided with a puzzle, and like you, I’m just trying to put the pieces together.