Post History

Getting more rigorous with my aproach , I will try to measure always the same way.
I still can’t understand how 5.5 gets those constant strain numbers , and that somewhat regular growth ,we really aren’t all the same , most of the times my post bpfsl was impossible to measure ,maybe it was just that my pre bpfsl measurement was flawed since the beginning , so with that in mind, I will aproach the method again based on the assumption that my pre measurement was flawed since the beginning and that my aproach on measurments was flawed.

Iam still thinking if I turn on the heat before I put any weight and let it heat. Pypomitho didn’t preheat but he did turn on the heat since the beginning.
Pre bpfsl measured today around 16.5 ,hips neutral and ruler pressed firmly on my pubic bone 1cm above where the shaft leaves the body right on the bone since where the shaft leaves the body u can get some extra lenght when u press.

Check my previous log to get a overview on what I did.
My Log

Getting more rigorous with my aproach , I will try to measure always the same way.
I still can’t understand how 5.5 gets those constant strain numbers , and that somewhat regular growth ,we really aren’t all the same , most of the times my post bpfsl was impossible to measure ,maybe it was just that my pre bpfsl measurement was flawed since the beginning , so with that in mind, I will aproach the method again based on the assumption that my pre measurement was flawed since the beginning and that my aproach on measurments was flawed.

Iam still thinking if I turn on the heat before I put any weight and let it heat. Pypomitho didn’t preheat but he did turn on the heat since the beginning.
Pre bpfsl measured today around 16.5 ,hips neutral and ruler pressed firmly on my pubic bone 1cm where the shaft leaves the body right on the bone since where the shaft leaves the body u can get some extra lenght when u press.

Check my previous log to get a overview on what I did.
My Log

Getting more rigorous with my aproach , I will try to measure always the same way.
I still can’t understand how 5.5 gets those constant strain numbers , and that somewhat regular growth ,we really aren’t all the same , most of the times my post bpfsl was impossible to measure ,maybe it was just that my pre bpfsl measurement was flawed since the beginning , so with that in mind, I will aproach the method again based on the assumption that my pre measurement was flawed since the beginning and that my aproach on measurments was flawed.

Iam still thinking if I turn on the heat before I put any weight and let it heat. Pypomitho didn’t preheat but he did turn on the heat since the beginning.
Pre bpfsl measured today around 16.5 ,hips neutral and ruler pressed firmly on my pubic bone 1cm where the shaft leaves the body right on the bone since where the shaft leaves the body u can get some extra lenght when u press.

Check my previous log to get a overview on what I did.
My Log

Getting more rigorous with my aproach , I will try to measure always the same way.
I still can’t understand how 5.5 gets those constant strain numbers , and that somewhat regular growth ,we really aren’t all the same , most of the times my post bpfsl was impossible to measure ,maybe it was just that my pre bpfsl measurement was flawed since the beginning , so with that in mind, I will aproach the method again based on the assumption that my pre measurement was flawed since the beginning and that my aproach on measurments was flawed.

Iam still thinking if I turn on the heat before I put any weight and let it heat. Pypomitho didn't preheat but he did turn on the heat since the beginning.

Check my previous log to get a overview on what I did.
My Log

Getting more rigorous with my aproach , I will try to measure always the same way.
I still can’t understand how 5.5 gets those constant strain numbers , and that somewhat regular growth ,we really aren’t all the same , most of the times my post bpfsl was impossible to measure ,maybe it was just that my pre bpfsl measurement was flawed since the beginning , so with that in mind, I will aproach the method again based on the assumption that my pre measurement was flawed since the beginning and that my aproach on measurments was flawed.

Check my previous log to get a overview on what I did.
My Log