Originally Posted by gprent
This is the one I got, a GINHA HL.1602 Effective Shock Wave Therapy Shockwave Machine Pain Removal For Erectile Dysfunction ED Treatment Machine | Wish I showed this web site so you can see what it looks like, but check several sites for the best price.It took me awhile to figure out the directions probably because they were a translation from Chinese to English. The best settings for me are an intensity of 3 to 5 and a frequency of 8 to 10. I am not using it for size increase, but to improve my erections by increasing blood flow. I am only about 2 weeks into using it but so far my flaccid hang is fuller and my erection strength has improved a bit so time will tell.
All of the attachments you see are different impact head sizes for treating different areas of the body for sore or strained muscles and joints. And the panel on the left side with the 12 buttons are preselected impact setting for various areas of the body. The one for your penis is the 3rd button on the bottom row. This setting allows you to change the impact strength or force and the frequency of the number of strikes per minute.
This has the exact same wand as my SW10, but a smaller control unit. Prices are coming down on these li ESWT units it seems. Mine was $1200 2+yrs ago, now well under $1000. My concern with smaller units, especially the rocket/phoenix, is their expected or warrantied life. (Warranty for a Chinese unit, right). My unit was stated for life of 1,000,000 pulses and I now have over 500,000 pulses from over 100 applications, and with no mechanical problems. I am half way to needing a replacement unit.
I also have had several gainswave applications with positive results, leading me to purchase my own unit. I’ve stated elsewhere that my unit is not the equal of a gainswave unit, but I believe it delivers 75-80% of the quality of those $30,000+ pneumatic units. Bottom line is I get ED relief at a fraction of the cost of going to the doctor.
My current routine of an application every two weeks at 4,500 pulses at 90mj and 15mHz using the smallest 15mm round head. There are several peer reviewed papers discussing the value of application procedures with lower pulse counts and lower energy, or extremely high pulse counts, etc. I have tried all of them and they all seem to generate positive results.
Initial: 7” BPEL; 6” NBPEL; 5.25” - 5.5” MEG
Current: 7-7/8” BPEL; 7-3/8” NBPEL; 8.5” BPFSL; 6.5” MEG; 6”x5” Flaccid.
Goal: Improved/consistent EQ while managing ED. Secondary: maintain current stats.