In terms of your anti-establishment beliefs and praise of independant (unsanctioned) sources, I pretty much agree. That being said, when there is ‘medically established-peer reviewed’ studies available, there’s certainly no harm in citing them to help establish a point, which is what I have attempted to do in the following, which I hope addresses some of boner's concerns :)
DMSO
I hope I’m not wrong in stating that we all understand DMSO has a very powerful ability to penetrate skin/tissue/cell membranes, and that what’s unclear is its scar dissolving properties.
"Therapeutic and toxic agents that are not soluble in water are often soluble in DMSO…Properties that are considered to be particularly important to its therapeutic and toxic effects include: its own rapid penetration and enhanced penetration of other substances across biologic membranes…
http://www.ncbi … /pubmed/3510103
Proposed explanation:
"It has been suggested that DMSO (1) removes much of the lipid matrix of the stratum corneum, making holes or artificial shunts in the penetration barrier; (2) produces reversible configurational changes in protein structure brought about by substitution of integral water molecules; and (3) functions as a swelling agent … ."
[Amdur, M.O., J. Doull, C.D. Klaasen (eds). Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology. 4th ed. New York, NY: Pergamon Press, 1991., p. 61] **PEER REVIEWED**
One human study I found showed that topical application of DMSO helped in the healing of skin ulcers/hardening caused by sclerosis. Now sclerosis works by pathogenically increasing the amount of connective tissue on the affected site (fibrosis). So I think this is an indication that DMSO can assist in the dissolution of scar and aberrant connective tissue, at least in skin-related fibrosis.
http://www.ncbi … /pubmed/6576688
There is also some (vaguely related to our purposes) studies that suggest DMSO, via its established anti-inflammatory effects can prevent and/or reduce ‘adhesions’ (in this case, pathogenic joining of cells (including fibrosis)to one another due to inflammatory and healing processes)
http://www.ncbi … pubmed/15253075
It has been used medically to treat abdominal adhesions in humans which were the result of stomach surgery.
http://www.ncbi … /pubmed/9290192
Iodine
Well I finally made it to Iodine but now I can’t really be bothered, there’s quite a bit of information on iodine’s effects but to find anything in relation to fibrotic scar healing you have to sort through an incredibly large amount of information relating to thyroid diseases, which I’m not going to do right now. I did, however, find a few things
It’s only a case report since I can’t access the full report I can’t comment on the power of its scientific methods used, but since it’s on pubmed, it’s probably not too shabby. The report basically says that topical iodine successfully regenerated a number of old and new scars that the subject had incurred.
http://www.ncbi … pubmed/19168293
There’s another study, somewhere (but I lost it), which showed that betadene (iodine) reduces scar formation after woud-type injuries.
Thoughts
Finally, of course, we have x10d's case report itself. Now I try to be weary of miracle cures, and x10d’s report does edge on the side of miracle, since his results sound so good. Few things to keep in mind though. Since there is a lack of reliable studies to say one way or another and the science is shakey - since no one really knows exactly how DMSO works at a cellular level let alone what it might do in combination with iodine - we can’t be sure what’s really going on here. Also, though x10d has described similar symptoms as originally described in his thread, he has described them as due to a cumulation of injuries and healings over a long time, which I think may, possibly, be a different cause to what some (including myself) have experienced from a relatively short time with either PE or some other related injury. So all this is speculation anyway.
At the very least, I don’t believe iodine with DMSO, even applied directly to the penis, would be particularly dangerous (though I’d not do it immediately prior to PEing!). There’s plenty of user reports who’ve had no adverse health concerns as a direct result of DMSO. And topical (or otherwise) iodine is certainly not dangerous, so (since we’re talking about atomic/nascent iodine), I feel it’s unlikely a solvent like DMSO combined with iodine would have any unexpected/unwanted interactions.
So I think I’ll give it a shot 7:^) , a fair amount of DMSO can be gotten for under $10 and the iodine isn’t too much more on Amazon or if you search around on google for ‘nascent iodine’.