Thunder's Place

The big penis and mens' sexual health source, increasing penis size around the world.

Hair loss - anything to reverse it or prevent it? Is hair transplantation an option?

Originally Posted by kingscounty
That looks fantastic! I’m interested in the same surgery. My hair and my cock have always been my biggest insecurities. I’m actually shocked I still have most of my hair. It’s receding that’s for sure but all the men on my dads side were bald by their 20’s. I’m pushing 40 and still just receding. My mom side is a mixed bag and I do have her hair type.

LG is right definitely do your homework. There is one of the best in NYC but the guy wants $500 just for an appointment. My wife’s plastic surgeon recommended him and after I told him how he wanted $500 just for an appointment his jaw hit the floor.

Yeah I have pretty much decided to go to turkey should the need arise. Very similar situation to your my mums side have no hairloss whatsoever, saw a family gathering pic on my maternal grandmothers phone everyone on her side of the family had a full head of dark thick hair. Dad bald by 40 so I dont know what I will get. But I will get on propecia for sure as soon as I hit 30, not just for hairloss but for prostate health also.

Originally Posted by HenrikL

Yeah I have pretty much decided to go to turkey should the need arise. Very similar situation to your my mums side have no hairloss whatsoever, saw a family gathering pic on my maternal grandmothers phone everyone on her side of the family had a full head of dark thick hair. Dad bald by 40 so I dont know what I will get. But I will get on propecia for sure as soon as I hit 30, not just for hairloss but for prostate health also.

Funny you mention Turkey. My wife’s dr said he had a patient go to Turkey, enjoy a vacation and get transplant surgery for around 5k.

Originally Posted by kingscounty
Funny you mention Turkey. My wife’s dr said he had a patient go to Turkey, enjoy a vacation and get transplant surgery for around 5k.

They have amazing results. They also do beard to hair transplants should you have bad donor area.

Originally Posted by Platonist
Absolute pseudo-science rubbish. Discussing this with you would be pointless.


That seems to be your opinion on anyone that disagrees with you. Your a bright guy who can add a lot to the forum if you’d just think before you type. Beside haven’t you called Pe pseudo-science before?

P.S I’m not saying I agree in anyway with Henrik


Last edited by kingscounty : 01-07-2019 at .

Originally Posted by kingscounty
That seems to be your opinion on anyone disagrees with you. Your a bright who can add a lot to forum if you’d just think before you type. Beside haven’t you called Pe pseudo-science before?

P.S I’m not saying I agree in anyway with Henrik

No, that sentence is indeed pseudo-science crap; and I do think it’s important to flag such things. Too many young men might read that sort of thing and believe it has merit. It simply doesn’t. There are real world consequences to what people might absorb from boards like this.

I’ve never said that PE is pseudo-science; I’ve said that most people who have heard about it think it is.

Anyway, thank you for the compliment; I’ll try to think more before typing.

Originally Posted by Platonist
No, that sentence is indeed pseudo-science crap; and I do think it’s important to flag such things. Too many young men might read that sort of thing and believe it has merit. It simply doesn’t. There are real world consequences to what people might absorb from boards like this.

I’ve never said that PE is pseudo-science; I’ve said that most people who have heard about it think it is.

Anyway, thank you for the compliment; I’ll try to think more before typing.


Your absoulutey right, especially huge amounts of certain supplements such as vitamin D and K. Too much can be lethal.

I must have misread. My apologies for that.

Originally Posted by Platonist
No, that sentence is indeed pseudo-science crap; and I do think it’s important to flag such things. Too many young men might read that sort of thing and believe it has merit. It simply doesn’t. There are real world consequences to what people might absorb from boards like this.

I’ve never said that PE is pseudo-science; I’ve said that most people who have heard about it think it is.

Anyway, thank you for the compliment; I’ll try to think more before typing.

Let’s then stick to what MD’s that have gone through medical school and the pharmaceutical companys that have produced a drug appliant with the strict regulations in place says then as far as side effect profile of proscar (5mg) 5 times the normal dose, and 10 times the dose I’d personally take for hairloss.
Consensus is that there really is no case for stating lowering dht causes anything bad to happen to your penis or physical well being. But hey don’t take my word for it ask your doctor or go check on webMD etc. The incidence of erectile dysfunction after 5 years will not be statistically significantly greater than placebo and thus most likely caused by other factors. Also don’t forget that an enlarged prostate is very bad for EQ.

I forgot to recommend: Azelaic acid and Ketoconazole shampoo. A good shampoo is regenpure DR and a good azelaic acid source is the cream Skinoren 20%. Another great product is Minoxidilmax 5% Azelaic Acid, Minoxidil, Retin A and Caffeine mixture. Just be sure to get the Propylene Glycole version or it will dry too fast and leave crystal residue in your hair which is a total annoyance.

Propecia

Originally Posted by HenrikL
Wow that looks great! You were lucky to have all the right factors in place! Do you take propecia for hairloss and prostate health or did you not lose that much/fast in the first place?

Tried it and it did nothing for me. From what I’ve read Propecia isn’t very effective on frontal / receding hair lines, better with the rear area. I tried Monoxidil and a variety of other topical products with no success.
All of my hair loss was in the temple areas and extending back. Very thin and getting thinner at the time. The scalp that they harvest the hair from is in the back above your neck. Much of what they can harvest depends on how loose your scalp is. Fortunately for me I had more than adequate scalp. The surgeon had around 12 ladies with microscopes dissecting the follicles from the harvested section of my scalp. One, two and three hair follicles are then strategically planted. It takes about 8 - 10 weeks and BOOM the hair starts coming in like a crop!

Originally Posted by HenrikL
Let’s then stick to what MD’s that have gone through medical school and the pharmaceutical companys that have produced a drug appliant with the strict regulations in place says then as far as side effect profile of proscar (5mg) 5 times the normal dose, and 10 times the dose I’d personally take for hairloss.
Consensus is that there really is no case for stating lowering dht causes anything bad to happen to your penis or physical well being. But hey don’t take my word for it ask your doctor or go check on webMD etc. The incidence of erectile dysfunction after 5 years will not be statistically significantly greater than placebo and thus most likely caused by other factors. Also don’t forget that an enlarged prostate is very bad for EQ.

Your naïveté regarding Mds and webMD (lol? seriously?) - not to mention the “strict” regulatory process*** - is frankly dangerous for your own health; I hope you don’t influence others.

Many people taking “statins” - among other dubious pharmaceuticals, usually a boatload of them by the time they’re middle aged - use the same sort of poor judgement. And that judgement is not based in science, but in shoddy propaganda. Moreover, unfortunately for your argument the concept of “a consensus” is totally scientifically irrelevant.

DHT does not “cause” an enlarged prostate; if you look into the actual research and not what Merck tells you, you’d be surprised.

____

***whom do you think those regulations are FOR? Indeed, who writes them in the first place?

Originally Posted by Platonist
Your naïveté regarding Mds and webMD (lol? seriously?) - not to mention the “strict” regulatory process*** - is frankly dangerous for your own health; I hope you don’t influence others.

Many people taking “statins” - among other dubious pharmaceuticals, usually a boatload of them by the time they’re middle aged - use the same sort of poor judgement. And that judgement is not based in science, but in shoddy propaganda. Moreover, unfortunately for your argument the concept of “a consensus” is totally scientifically irrelevant.

DHT does not “cause” an enlarged prostate; if you look into the actual research and not what Merck tells you, you’d be surprised.

____

***whom do you think those regulations are FOR? Indeed, who writes them in the first place?

Statins are extremely important medication for people with dyslipidemia. Statins are the reason my grandmother is alive after her heart bypass surgery, I have seen the good and bad. Too high dosage= bad side effects. The perfect dosage=perfect lipid levels and no new blockaged even reversal of athersclerosis and still alive 21 years after surgery!

Usually the cockoos advocating no to statins even though they already had multiple cardiovascular events themselves are not long lived. Ofcourse people should listen to their doctor who uses the best collective knowleadge to date to recommend medication and inform about medications.

Originally Posted by HenrikL
Statins are extremely important medication for people with dyslipidemia. Statins are the reason my grandmother is alive after her heart bypass surgery, I have seen the good and bad. Too high dosage= bad side effects. The perfect dosage=perfect lipid levels and no new blockaged even reversal of athersclerosis and still alive 21 years after surgery!

I’m happy for your grandmother but that’s not evidence of anything whatsoever. Statins are very poorly researched. And, they are based upon an erroneous understanding of the nature cardiovascular disease.

Quote
Usually the cockoos advocating no to statins even though they already had multiple cardiovascular events themselves are not long lived. Ofcourse people should listen to their doctor who uses the best collective knowleadge to date to recommend medication and inform about medications.

Wow. Good luck. I’ll stick with science thanks ;)

Originally Posted by HenrikL

Let’s then stick to what MD’s that have gone through medical school and the pharmaceutical companys that have produced a drug appliant with the strict regulations in place says then as far as side effect profile of proscar (5mg) 5 times the normal dose, and 10 times the dose I’d personally take for hairloss.

Consensus is that there really is no case for stating lowering dht causes anything bad to happen to your penis or physical well being. But hey don’t take my word for it ask your doctor or go check on webMD etc. The incidence of erectile dysfunction after 5 years will not be statistically significantly greater than placebo and thus most likely caused by other factors. Also don’t forget that an enlarged prostate is very bad for EQ.

For those who think hair loss meds are safe—

Quebec court OK’s lawsuit alleging link between hair-loss drugs and erectile dysfunction | CBC News


Started 6.4" in the tube 2/18. Now 8" 6/10/19 in tube. 6/10/19 BPEL 7.7", BPFSL 8". Began extender 9/4/18, followed by pumping. Short term goal 8" in the tube.Long term goal. 8" x 6" outside of tube. Penimaster rods 11/6/18: UP: 2x.5cm, 2x2cm, 2x4cm, 2x8cm,2x6cm

Originally Posted by Platonist
I’m happy for your grandmother but that’s not evidence of anything whatsoever. Statins are very poorly researched. And, they are based upon an erroneous understanding of the nature cardiovascular disease.

Wow. Good luck. I’ll stick with science thanks ;)

Poorly researched? Do you have any idea how hard it is to get a drug approved by the FDA? And all very smart people, guys with lots of degrees to their names with tons of experience created those drugs. Oh I know they did for the money. They don’t know how to do real research like some here do. How silly.

Originally Posted by LGHanger
I had a hair transplant back in 2007 by a guy in Vancouver Canada (Hasson & Wong).
Wong did my procedure and told me up front “you’re gonna be a slam dunk, you have a lot of good donor hair”. I couldn’t be happier with the work he did. Nobody can tell I had a procedure. Looks totally natural and since the hair is harvested from the back of your scalp where it is genetically predisposed to never recede or go away, the transplanted follicles will always remain where they are planted. Back then my procedure cost me $5800.00 bucks. If you’re considering a hair transplant do your homework and make sure you find a reputable surgeon with lots of experience and good referral recommendations!

That s really cool.What was the actual name of this transplant procedure ? Grafting hair follicles ?

Top

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:44 PM.